Earlopain

As per #427: What is the actual usage of adding a gallery link from the submission url? The gallery link is already easily visible, and it just duplicates the information....

I brought this up in the staff chat, automatically adding the gallery link when you can infer it from the submission url is not something that we want to do

Just the one you added is fine

Please don't forget to update your tests, like when you added `NITTER_HOSTS`. You also left a reference to the weasyl class in `alternates.rb`, the weasyl tests are also still there.

Use `extend` instead of `include`, that should work. I looked at how danbooru does it.

It seems to work fine for me with `extend`. Maybe there were some issues when you removed the gallery url parameter? You will need to remove the setup block when...

`alternate_should_work` is just a normal function being evaluated top-to-bottom, which means that you can put plain local-scoped variables in there. Just move the instance variable out of the current setup...

Did you commit the right thing? Only the test is present, and something else unrelated in an ancient fixer script seems to have slipped in

Could you also do some rebasing? The commit history is pretty messy right now. If you don't want to bother, that's fine. I can just squash merge instead.

Hm, I would just go with `[Posts]` in this case I think. It's not an exact science, but I try to relate my commits to a rails model. Since this...