sweet icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
sweet copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon ESIPFed

Align rock ontology with CGI vocabulary

Open smrgeoinfo opened this issue 6 years ago • 5 comments

Sub classes of rock are not logically coherent. the categorization of EarthMaterials in SWEET should be aligned with the CGI Earth Material vocabulary http://resource.geosciml.org/classifierScheme/cgi/2016.01/simplelithology

smrgeoinfo avatar Jul 18 '19 21:07 smrgeoinfo

I'm getting a not found error on this link:

image

Does it resolve on your machine?

pbuttigieg avatar Jul 18 '19 21:07 pbuttigieg

Try http://resource.geosciml.org/classifier/cgi/lithology

dr-shorthair avatar Jul 19 '19 00:07 dr-shorthair

its also loaded into CORS http://cor.esipfed.org/ont?iri=http://resource.geosciml.org/classifierScheme/cgi/2016.01/simplelithology

I'll need to do some sleuthing to see where I came up with that URI for the vocabulary

also see http://cor.esipfed.org/ont?iri=urn:cgi:classifierScheme:CGI:LithologyOWL:201001 for an owl ontology based on the skos definitions.

smrgeoinfo avatar Jul 19 '19 06:07 smrgeoinfo

@smrgeoinfo does this align with Loop3D at all?

dr-shorthair avatar Mar 08 '21 22:03 dr-shorthair

The Loop3D GSO-RockMaterials (now public) are directly from the CGI SimpleLithology, with a simple skos to owl conversion described in the (draft) GSC OFR. We've added additional classes to handle altered rocks because of the requirements for Loop3D; a lot of those came from the cgi AlterationType vocabulary, with some definitions added.

smrgeoinfo avatar Mar 31 '21 22:03 smrgeoinfo