Investigate possible bug in association p-value validation

[eks-ebi]

In this submission (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/depo-curation/submissions/6491a97fe6cd8200017d5250), an association with p-value = 2.7E+10 seems to have passed through validation and was released to the public GWAS Catalog.

This should not have passed validation because the exponent is positive, rather than negative, therefore the p-value is much higher than the valid p-value cut-off of 1.0E-5.

Please investigate how this was allowed through validation, and whether there could be a bug in the template validation. The incorrect p-value is visible in the template history.