efo
efo copied to clipboard
Saerching for MONDO_00000001 id in EFO (which is the same content than EFO_OTAR_PROFILES in this version 3.74
Hi Opentargets team! I was looking into the differences between EFO releases, and since the size of EFO_otar_profile and EFO owl files where about the same , I though the content would be the same (more than slim?) I look at the file (mapping_efo_mondo)[] mentioned in the README of this release , and I see there is a MONDO term root to map to EFO --> MONDO_00000001.
But when I look for it (using owl or json files, and neo4j or protege tools) I cannot find the id MONDO_00000001 , but yes to the mapped EFO_0000408.
- should i consider that the mapped MONDOids may wont appear as node.lbl? only as efo_id?
- EFO_0000408 <- also i noticed in the "efo_otar_slim" this term does not appear. am I right?
- is it any stats summary where i could see number of nodes and relationships different in each different release for the version_374?
Again many thanks for this big effort!
Note: this is in line to this other issue (missing documentation or README for these releases)