It would be great if a term's native ontology is listed as primary search result ontology e.g. 'has part'

Open ddooley opened this issue 5 years ago • 1 comments

For example, a search on 'has part' returns a BFO hit, but the "Ontology:" field tends to list some ontology that isn't BFO. I think it is safe to say prefix of term should force selection of matching ontology? Example:

has part BFO:0000051 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000051 Ontology: Genomic Epidemiology Ontology GENEPIO Also in: MFMOOMIABISOVAEGEOCEPHOHDAEROBCOOGGIDOPCOOBCSFLUAGROINOSDGIOSTATOROPPOMSIODIDEOMPIOFBbiECOCOREOGSFENVOICOOOSTTMCOMICROCLOCAROBCGOAFOOMITPOHTNIAOOAEGENOOBIBOPLUPABSPOZECOSEPIOZPLABOFLOPOAPOLLO_SVNBOICEOOHMIPDRODUODRONHPMPPLANAWBLSWBbtOBIFBdvFBbtFBcvFBcvCROMROEUPATHOPMIVOGOCLECOOHPIXPOWBPhenotypeEFOPATOPHIPOCHEBIFOODONOMRSEPLANPUBERONONTONEOCHEMINF

Also, if we could get 'Also in' list to be sorted, that would be sweet.

Thanks for consideration,

Damion

Feb 05 '20 04:02 ddooley

Thank you for the suggestions. We will attend to this when we have availability.

Feb 06 '20 08:02 henrietteharmse