E3SM icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
E3SM copied to clipboard

Adds support for 0.25 deg ELM grid

Open bishtgautam opened this issue 1 year ago • 2 comments

  • Adds 0.25 deg ELM surface dataset for 1850 and 2010.
  • These new surface datasets include parameters for the TOP subgrid solar radiation scheme.
  • Adds three new -res <r025_IcoswISC30E3r5 | ne120pg2_r025_IcoswISC30E3r5 | ne30pg2_r025_IcoswISC30E3r5.
  • Includes linear and nonlinear maps for the following:
    • ne120np4.pg2 (atm) and r025 (lnd)
    • ne30np4.pg2 (atm) and r025 (lnd)

[BFB]

bishtgautam avatar Feb 06 '24 17:02 bishtgautam

PR Preview Action v1.4.7 :---: :rocket: Deployed preview to https://E3SM-Project.github.io/E3SM/pr-preview/pr-6212/ on branch gh-pages at 2024-03-25 19:08 UTC

github-actions[bot] avatar Feb 06 '24 17:02 github-actions[bot]

  1. [x] ELM only case with BGC + TOP solar parameterization for 1850 ran successfully for 5-days
./create_newcase \
-case r025_IcoswISC30E3r5.I1850CNPRDCTCBCTOP.chrysalis.5151ecfc87.2024-02-06 \
-res r025_IcoswISC30E3r5 \
-mach chrysalis \
-compiler intel \
-compset I1850CNPRDCTCBCTOP

bishtgautam avatar Feb 06 '24 17:02 bishtgautam

@wlin7 @acme-y9s please review.

rljacob avatar Feb 29 '24 18:02 rljacob

notes: Some Chrysalis testing suggested issues but could have been from OS/firmware updates on Chrysalis (since rolled back).

rljacob avatar Mar 21 '24 17:03 rljacob

@hydrotian Could you please review the MOSART-related settings in this PR? @acme-y9s Could you please review the ELM-related settings in this PR?

bishtgautam avatar Mar 25 '24 19:03 bishtgautam

@bishtgautam The MOSART-related settings look okay to me. @rljacob I noticed that from https://github.com/E3SM-Project/E3SM/pull/5979 MOSART started to require a mesh file frivinp_mesh for integration with the MOAB coupler. From my understanding, MOSART should produce BFB results when using either the MOAB coupler (with the mesh file) or the MCT coupler (without a mesh file). Is that correct?

hydrotian avatar Mar 25 '24 23:03 hydrotian

No it won't be BFB because of slight differences in how mapping weights are calculated online vs. offline. The mesh file is ignored when using the MCT coupler.

rljacob avatar Mar 26 '24 04:03 rljacob

merged to next

peterdschwartz avatar Apr 09 '24 18:04 peterdschwartz

merged to master

peterdschwartz avatar Apr 10 '24 18:04 peterdschwartz