MDAPL
MDAPL copied to clipboard
Should we add “Further reading” sections?
Should (some) chapters get a “Further reading” section, which contains links to other resources relevant to the contents of the chapter?
These sections could be optional/mandatory, and contain:
- links to articles, papers, blog posts, ...
- Dyalog workshops or user meeting talks
- arbitrary pages on the internet
- references to other books/printed materials
This thought was motivated by the fact that I wanted to link to @rikedyp's webinar on Boolean scans when talking about them in the book, but there are plenty of other resources I could have linked already.
I think it would be a good idea.
The name of these sections is up for discussion, obviously. Some ideas:
- Further reading/learning/resources
- More reading/learning/resources
- Complementary materials
- Deep dive
- Deepen your understanding
- ...
Would love this, personally