Gabriel Radanne
Gabriel Radanne
I'm not very fond of inconsistency with regular ocaml by default, it's confusing for most people, and informed users can change the default if they want to.
Hum, ok, fair enough. Would it be possible to enable only in presence of camlp4 ?
That's an excellent question. The current functor stack is not exactly optimized for what you are doing, unfortunately. The functions which are extracted in `Xml_wrap.T` are the minimal functions in...
All that being said, if you have ideas on how to improve the current API to make such usecases easier, I'm very open to such suggestions.
> I think I'll try this approach and, if some functions will seem really useful to add them to `Xml_wrap.T` module type, I'll make a PR. `Xml_wrap.T` is intended to...
I don't see how you would do anything about it in a composable way. Consider: ``` ocaml let mytitle = [%html5 "A Fabulous Web Page" ] let myhead = [%html5...
@hhugo I'm doing some things around the ppx again. Do you think this is worth the effort ?
If people want this to happen, please voice your opinion on the choice of the templating language in https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/choice-of-template-language-for-tyxml/1863 .
And I found the issue, and it was stupid: I forgot to put a `method can_focus = true`. I feel slightly dumb now. We can now move on to my...
I'm not completely sure how you would do it, in fact, it seems to introduce too much parametricity to be acceptable.