Dragon-Baroque

> No idea if that works for SDL2 , though, because of the acinclude.m4 things. Precisely. On my personal source tree, I have eradicated the whole `m4/` directory as being...

I have faced the same problem of a coexistence of and a choice between two versions of a product. For GTK with Exult Studio, initially GTK+ 2 and GTK+ 3,...

At this point, I am interested in the nesting of the processes when the build crashes. Take the build https://github.com/exult/exult/actions/runs/4466704272/jobs/7845223889 which is the last failing `ci-android` build before @DominusExult made...

Thank you @DominusExult. Before I push any update, I intend to exploit the run attempts you made, looking at the differences in the logs between job 2 ( ubuntu 20.04...

> Yes, you need to clone my fork and then just push. Not permitted, I tried both a new branch and a small commit, and then that same small commit...

@DominusExult I may have lost the invite email. But I have found the invite in my GitHub user profile. Now accepted. > Now where is that happening ? The Build...

@DominusExult, I restored your branch `going_through_make` to Ubuntu latest, and I removed the `stacktrace=all`. Now it differs from `exult/exult` at `configure.ac`, `files/Makefile.am`, and at the various `make -s LIBTOOLFLAGS="silent"`. Of...

> The big question is still why building expack fails on the 22.04 runner while it works in my 22.04 VM. The `expack.cc` includes `unistd.h` then some Android SDK /...

> Odd that we still build expack even though building data is disabled. The configure options `--disable-tools` and `--disable-data` only set two Automake variables to false, respectively `BUILD_TOOLS` and `DATA_FILES`....

> Odd that we still build expack even though building data is disabled. By the way, there as some code in `configure.ac` that handles `expack` and `head2data` specially under a...