在SemEval2010Task8数据上没有达到你的效果？

[cjwen15]

Micro-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 71/1953 = 3.64% R = 71/2263 = 3.14% F1 = 3.37%

MACRO-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 6.65% R = 3.25% F1 = 3.49%

<<< The official score is (9+1)-way evaluation with directionality taken into account: macro-averaged F1 = 3.49% >>>

不知是否模型的问题？

[wenyu332]

Micro-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 71/1953 = 3.64% R = 71/2263 = 3.14% F1 = 3.37%

MACRO-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 6.65% R = 3.25% F1 = 3.49%

<<< The official score is (9+1)-way evaluation with directionality taken into account: macro-averaged F1 = 3.49% >>>

不知是否模型的问题？

你好，不知道你后面有没有继续进行尝试，是否达到89%，你是自己重新训练还是直接使用作者提供的模型进行测试呢

[cjwen15]

Micro-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 71/1953 = 3.64% R = 71/2263 = 3.14% F1 = 3.37% MACRO-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 6.65% R = 3.25% F1 = 3.49% <<< The official score is (9+1)-way evaluation with directionality taken into account: macro-averaged F1 = 3.49% >>> 不知是否模型的问题？

你好，不知道你后面有没有继续进行尝试，是否达到89%，你是自己重新训练还是直接使用作者提供的模型进行测试呢

我是直接使用作者的模型进行测试的，无其他修改

[wenyu332]

Micro-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 71/1953 = 3.64% R = 71/2263 = 3.14% F1 = 3.37% MACRO-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 6.65% R = 3.25% F1 = 3.49% <<< The official score is (9+1)-way evaluation with directionality taken into account: macro-averaged F1 = 3.49% >>> 不知是否模型的问题？

你好，不知道你后面有没有继续进行尝试，是否达到89%，你是自己重新训练还是直接使用作者提供的模型进行测试呢

我是直接使用作者的模型进行测试的，无其他修改

好的，谢谢你 那你最后结果有多少呢

[DongPoLI]

Micro-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 71/1953 = 3.64% R = 71/2263 = 3.14% F1 = 3.37%

MACRO-averaged result (excluding Other): P = 6.65% R = 3.25% F1 = 3.49%

<<< The official score is (9+1)-way evaluation with directionality taken into account: macro-averaged F1 = 3.49% >>>

不知是否模型的问题？

模型没有问题，另一个我最近的工作:Mul-BERT，你可以看看，在SemEval 2010 Task 8 上最高达到90.72%（Macro-F1), 模型很简单

[LemonQC]

您好，请问哪里可以看到论文呢