Dominic D

Yep, that works. Just to check does `if(Zotero.BetterBibTeX)` work to check whether Better BibTeX is installed and ready?

Yeah, that would definitely make sense. At the moment this works if you copy an item to bibtex, then import a citation using this bibtex (ie. the `extra` field gets...

It should also be possible to show release notes in the Zotero add-ons menu by including the `` tag like in Better BibTeX [here](https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/releases/download/release/update.rdf). I haven't tested this though. But...

I just downloaded Better BibTeX v5.4.28 from [here](https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/releases) and installed it in Zotero. Then I restarted Zotero and checked for updates and I see this:  But trying to expand...

If we resolve #156 by requiring a source item in the constructor of a citation, I think this issue is easier to solve? But this isn't the only solution. Let...

No worries! Yeah, having it as an option is what I meant, but I wasn't that clear. I think this shouldn't really be our job, but I found this common...

I just checked and crossref [does](https://api.crossref.org/v1/works/10.1038/s41467-020-19757-y) actually have all the same references, but a bit more helpfully in a field called `unstructured`. If this is common on crossref, we would...

> What do you mean having "that link with retrieving citations"? > > As I see it, having the plugin understand other unique identifiers (such as arxiv id) would help...

[OpenAlex](https://docs.openalex.org/) IDs could also be nice, if this database offers significant advantages over CrossRef et c.

[This](https://somsubhra.github.io/github-release-stats/?username=diegodlh&repository=zotero-cita&page=1&per_page=10) provides a nice visualisation.