yellowbrick
yellowbrick copied to clipboard
Improvements to the Manifold Visualizer
The following improvements can be made to the manifold visualizer:
Note to contributors: items in the below checklist don't need to be completed in a single PR; if you see one that catches your eye, feel to pick it off the list!
- [ ] describe the number of features the embedding represents (e.g. the number of columns in X) and optionally the number of points in the dataset
- [ ] create a documentation example for clustering
- [x] add
frameon=Trueto legend - [ ] create documentation example using the standard scalar
- [ ] get the visual tests to work on windows/decrease tolerance
- [ ] decrease tolerance of
test_manifold_pandas(not sure why the tolerance is so high) - [x] investigate the
n_neighborsattribute; see below.
See #398 #399
Hi! I wanted to work on the frameon feature? Is that still up for grabs?
hi @jimmyshah Thanks for your interest in contributing to yellowbrick. however we rarely assign issues. But, You are more that welcome to open a PR for this addition. I look forward to seeing your contribution.
@lwgray Thank you for the quick response! Sounds good to me, I'm excited to contribute!
Hello again! I was interested in working on the n_neighbors attribute issue, is that one still available?
hi @jimmyshah Let me again Thank you for your last contribution to yellowbrick. In regard to your currest ask, we rarely assign issues. But, You are more that welcome to open a PR for this addition. I look forward to seeing your next contribution.
Hey there @jimmyshah and welcome back! The maintainers don't generally assign issues to contributors (we're only 5-6 people so that would be a bit too much management overhead for us), so the best strategy is to check if there's already an open PR addressing the issue (which in this case, there isn't... yet! 😉) Look forward to seeing your next PR!
Thank you for the assistance @rebeccabilbro and @lwgray, I'm happy to contribute! I'll make a PR request shortly, after I've had a chance to make some code changes 🙂
@naresh-bachwani -- please see this issue as you work on #930; @rebeccabilbro pointed out in #927 that we might be able to close this as you work through it.
@naresh-bachwani have we managed to make progress on this? Can we close the issue?