Devika Goel

Hello, Here is my proposal for setting reminders for author revisions. As you can see in both videos, I have included the step of setting reminders as part of the...

Hi @taslangraham, Thank you so much for reaching out regarding this issue. Regarding the Notes/thoughts/ideas/questions: > 1. The Mark as Unrestricted option takes precedence over any selections made under Limit...

Hello, Based on the above discussions, here's my UX/UI proposal for the feature: We can add a section in Settings > Workflow > Review > Review Recommendations. This would include...

Hello @felixhelix Is there a recording or screenshots showing how this works? From a UI/UX perspective, I was thinking of keeping it simple with plain text comments, without any formatting...

Hello @felixhelix Is there a recording or screenshots showing how this works? From a UI/UX perspective, I was thinking of keeping it simple with plain text comments, without any formatting...

How about we make the peer review process more interactive? If someone is interested in reviewing an article, they could click on 'Review article,' and then the page would expand...

Hello, @ewhanson and I had a quick discussion about this, and while we're still going over the details, I think it's best to focus on enabling public commenting for now....

@felixhelix you can adapt the styling based on the UI components you have in your journal or the OJS default. I just provided a structure of the comments should look...

Hello, Based on the above discussions, here's my UX/UI proposal for the feature: Let's include a 'Suggested Reviewers' section in the submission process, right after 'Comments for the Editors.' This...

Hello @asmecher > Let's try to cut down on the fields the author needs to fill out per reviewer suggestion. At a glance, I think "Interests" and "Department" are unnecessary....