Public Mint option of Pixel Avatars

[etherinsight]

We had brainstormed on our meeting last week that we wanted to have an option for public without dao tokens to mint Pixel Avatars. We will charge a small fee ( to be decided ) for the public mint and allow a certain amount(TBD) of public mints.

Pixel Avatars will be generated form metadata of Developer Dao token. For public mints, we can randomize the metadata and create a headless avatar that doesn't depend on the Dao token.

To decide:

• How many public mints to allow?
• Should we limit public mints per address? For example only let one address publicly mint one avatar. This will stop someone buying all public mints since we plan to keep the cost low.
• What price to charge for public mint
• How to market the public mint option

Todo:

• test out the contract to ensure the collected funds can only be withdraw by the allow listed wallet or the contract deployer address. We will use the dao address to deploy contract.

[Dhaiwat10]

Should we limit public mints per address? For example only let one address publicly mint one avatar.

This shouldn't cause any problems for people other than the ones who claimed multiple genesis NFTs (~~how do we decide which one they can mint & which ones they can't~~ — that's simple lol, nvm but still the problem remains. who will be able to claim the NFTs 'left over' once these people own one of theirs?)

[etherinsight]

that's the thing we will need to figure out. how to ensure one wallet has one dao token. I think we have agreed on the discord somewhere that we want one token per holder and some people with multiple tokens plan to send it to others they think would be good fit for the dao.

There are some ways to ensure one real identity is tied to one address: https://www.brightid.org/ could be one solution.

[goldzulu]

Well done all. please make sure you fill up https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15D6GzxsdIoD8afSp1V4snPvYGOi8mdQtHU8RgSKzPZI/edit

Should we close this???