Philip Molares
Philip Molares
I agree with the features, slide and yaml pages, but explaining the interface seems to really benefit from a multi-page approach something that we can't easily provide on the instance....
So the idea would be to have something like this? `HD_GUEST_ACCESS` with the options: - `DENY` - `READ` - `WRITE` - `CREATE` default (`DENY`) And the extra option `HD_GUEST_NOTE_CREATION_ALIAS` with...
Did that solve you problem @sachaz?
I'll link this old issue https://github.com/hedgedoc/hedgedoc/issues/521
So what would be the best idea here? And please keep in mind we should also expect api users and not only the new frontend.
> Anyone against using jsdiff for that? I think this can be answered with: No.
Sounds like a good idea then. Let's use unidiff and close this issue once the patch logic is implemented…
This discussion is finished the relevant information were ported into an implementation issue #2857
While I agree we should warn the user in that case, I think not starting is bit harsh. A big red warning would be useful imho.
As this issue is not really necessary for 2.0, we'll have a look at it again after 2.0.