debounce-promise: When options.accumulate is true, returned function has an altered call signature
Please fill in this template.
- [x] Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
- [x] Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
- [x] Add or edit tests to reflect the change.
- [x] Follow the advice from the readme.
- [x] Avoid common mistakes.
- [x] Run
npm test <package to test>.
Select one of these and delete the others:
If changing an existing definition:
- [x] Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes: https://github.com/bjoerge/debounce-promise#with-accumulatetrue
- [x] If this PR brings the type definitions up to date with a new version of the JS library, update the version number in the header.
When debounce is called with { accumulate: true }, the passed-in function will be called with a single parameter: an array of all calls, where each member is an array of all parameters it was called with, during its defer period. The new type definitions here reflect this asymmetric call signature compared to the default mode.
The passed-in function then should have a signature like (arg: Array<[string, number]>), even if it only takes one parameter to begin with, as something like string[][] seems to confuse TypeScript into thinking the returned function can take any number of string parameters.
@tprobinson Thank you for submitting this PR! I see this is your first time submitting to DefinitelyTyped 👋 — I'm the local bot who will help you through the process of getting things through.
This is a live comment which I will keep updated.
1 package in this PR
Code Reviews
Because you edited one package and updated the tests (👏), I can help you merge this PR once someone else signs off on it.
You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.
Status
- ✅ No merge conflicts
- ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
- 🕐 Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners or DT maintainers
Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.
Inactive
This PR has been inactive for 11 days — please try to get reviewers!
Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR
{
"type": "info",
"now": "-",
"pr_number": 61723,
"author": "tprobinson",
"headCommitOid": "537acf430fe14bd7dd1929bb102f9fdc4d23a1c1",
"mergeBaseOid": "86cb20c7f234f847a17d7d9fe8314604b49c01ba",
"lastPushDate": "2022-12-01T23:44:55.000Z",
"lastActivityDate": "2022-12-01T23:51:23.000Z",
"mergeRequestDate": "2022-12-01T23:51:23.000Z",
"mergeRequestUser": "tprobinson",
"hasMergeConflict": false,
"isFirstContribution": true,
"tooManyFiles": false,
"hugeChange": false,
"popularityLevel": "Popular",
"pkgInfo": [
{
"name": "debounce-promise",
"kind": "edit",
"files": [
{
"path": "types/debounce-promise/debounce-promise-tests.ts",
"kind": "test"
},
{
"path": "types/debounce-promise/index.d.ts",
"kind": "definition"
}
],
"owners": [
"whtsky"
],
"addedOwners": [
"tprobinson"
],
"deletedOwners": [],
"popularityLevel": "Popular"
}
],
"reviews": [
{
"type": "stale",
"reviewer": "sandersn",
"date": "2022-12-01T22:40:24.000Z",
"abbrOid": "2213dc2"
}
],
"mainBotCommentID": 1214291471,
"ciResult": "pass"
}
🔔 @whtsky — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.
It has been more than two weeks and this PR still has no reviews.
I'll bump it to the DT maintainer queue. Thank you for your patience, @tprobinson.
(Ping @whtsky.)
@tprobinson One or more reviewers has requested changes. Please address their comments. I'll be back once they sign off or you've pushed new commits. Thank you!
@sandersn Thank you for reviewing this PR! The author has pushed new commits since your last review. Could you take another look and submit a fresh review?
@sandersn Thank you for reviewing this PR! The author has pushed new commits since your last review. Could you take another look and submit a fresh review?
Ready to merge
:passport_control: Hi @tprobinson,
I can't accept a pull request until all of the checks in the "Status" section of this comment are green. I will let you know once that happens.
Thanks, and happy typing!
Re-ping @whtsky:
This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.
Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!