Ragnar
Ragnar
@aljo242, it seems I found the problem and fixed it, ran tests locally and mine passed successfully, hope now it'll be good
@aljo242 something's wrong wtih CI? Or does it need a changelog?
Hi @aljo242! Could you please tell me if womething's wrong with my pr or you just updating pr to no allowing it to close as a stale? Cause tests seem...
> Can you provide some benchmarks which show that the code improves performance? @Pratyush I have run them but they running really long, here's a fragment, do you need all...
master my branch @Pratyush oh. seems to be my implementation doesn't make any sense
But I've created a dedicated benchmark file (I can add it to this pr if needed) to measure the performance impact of removing redundant `take()` calls. The results show significant...
but i guess my bench file could be wrong therefore if it seems appropriate for you to close my pr, than in would be the best decision, i'll probable find...
@Pratyush added benchmark and updated cargo
> @DeVikingMark CI failing gonna fix it now, thanks
Hi @johnsaigle! Here's the proof that this change is correct: ## SDK automatically knows contract addresses The SDK has built-in contract addresses for all chains. When you don't specify `--contract-address`,...