David Clipsham

copyright year was mentioned here: https://github.com/digital-preservation/droid/pull/180

Thanks Richard, this makes sense and would be a welcome addition. I'm curious as to why, in the above examples SF favoured one over the other where there isn't a...

Thanks Richard, Hi Thomas. An explanation for the change can be found here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/pronom/Q2mXbNmNTbU Basically the previous set of Quicktime signatures seemed to have built up over time based primarily...

Yes, I'll adjust the PRONOM signature entry for this specific scenario (applies to the signature 'QuickTime variant4'): where the first atom at offset 4 is FTYP and the major brand...

Tricky one. The moov atom is vital for ID of Quicktime - things won't play without it. We try to anchor it near the beginning of the file with one...

Just to note - this is still on our backlog and I'll try to address it in our next release, probably around late-May

Apologies Richard, my fault entirely. I'm aiming for November for v95 and this update will be included.

Just to note ref https://github.com/digital-preservation/droid/issues/805#issuecomment-1220500644 - the other three signatures that make use of [!xxxx] type patterns are each very obviously trying to express sequences, not ranges

I appreciate it is not trivial to achieve this behaviour, but since 'not-range' can already (and as per spec) be expressed with e.g. [!AA:FF] and 'not-sequence' is self-evidently a useful...

see also https://github.com/digital-preservation/droid/issues/805#issuecomment-1220540470 - [Siegfried](https://github.com/richardlehane/siegfried) works as per spec