DavidGOrtega
DavidGOrtega
cml runner comes from cml_runner that means cml's runner to my mind. Seems that the cml command has brought the pandora's box about naming. Ideally speaking cml should probably be:...
> How is cml create different from cml update in behavior? Doesn't the latter imply the former?[1](https://github.com/iterative/cml/issues/762#user-content-fn-1-4adf7a71dfd8d13b0517603b37f4147d) Would it make more sense to provide cml create --update instead? `check` should...
Im not saying that the binary needs to do it. It's obviously impossible. What I try to expose is that if we change `setup-cml` or cml itself within the image...
> Unless we modify setup-cml and any other installation methods to create a dummy wrapper: > Maybe scripts? Thats exactly what i was suggesting and I think its the best...
> What can we do apart from documenting this behavior? Please read the stackoverflow link. It seems that its doable requiring the user to provide the JWT.
I don't find a proper way to do such unit tests aside recording the API responses as I have said so many times. If you are willing to do so...
This is working ``` cml runner runner --labels cml --single --repo https://github.com/DavidGOrtega/fashion_mnist --token XXXX ```
> 2\. breaks the aesthetics of having matching `.js` files and the pertaining directories[1](#user-content-fn-1-900c210740bded2a4c2921a0f6ec849d) Its currently breaking my own OCD aesthetics
Im removing #802 from the list. Its already within the #721 epic
Does not have to be in DVC, its just only find out a mechanism in CML