David Boike

Hi @pardahlman. It is not on the roadmap. I wouldn't suggest a PR as there's no guarantee we would ultimately merge it. It would be helpful to know a bit...

After [reviewing the docs](https://www.rabbitmq.com/consumer-priority.html), I don't think this would work like you think it would. Specifically this section: > When consumer priorities are in use, you can expect your highest...

Why try so hard to avoid runtime breaks in a major version? Are people really just doing a DLL replacement on a major version without recompiling?

Hi @rogierv, Unfortunately it will not be straightforward to replace Newtonsoft with System.Text.Json because users will have stored sagas encoded with Newtonsoft that must still be readable even if new...

At the same time, should also check the support for DateOnly and TimeOnly in the serialization of non-correlation saga properties as well. Pretty sure this requires a specific minimum version...

> As explained earlier these docs are auto generated. There is very little control we have over these. They might be autogenerated but they're generated _from somewhere_. They don't just...

@brettfo would it be possible to share any more details? We're trying to decide if our expectation is in line with what should happen. Our process reflects our current understanding...

Interesting. > it misses some cases where a Target Framework might be incompatible and that's why you're seeing a PR get generated that results in a build failure That's not...

The sample has instructions for running it that include [building the container images](https://docs.particular.net/samples/hosting/docker/#running-the-sample-building-container-images). That's why there are no dockerfiles. I'm afraid I don't understand what you're trying to say about...

After a bit of further investigation, we discovered there may be some updates required for the .NET 8 samples. Thanks for the feedback, we are taking a look.