David Arno

@theramis, how can this PR be unstuck, please? If tests are failing, but @viceice is saying they are unrelated to the PR, then this change seems likely to remain in...

Hi, is there any update on a 2024 version of this plugin? Just came across it and got very excited, only to discover it is compatible of 2023 and earlier...

> That said, being able to apply readonly to primary constructor parameters specifically I think has real potential value, and perhaps could be considered as a wider proposal to allow...

@julealgon, I get what you are saying. But if you look through many discussions here where people say "_can we have x in the language_", a very common response from...

@gafter, > Related to that, we should also permit `t is 3` when the type of `t` is a type parameter that is not constrained to be a reference type....

Rather than implementing this limited feature, could the team just finish implementing pattern matching, including `match` expressions and get that released, please?

@bondsbw, Exactly. They should prioritise finishing the half-complete pattern matching feature over adding new features like nullable reference types and those interface thingies 😉