DavHau
DavHau
The case where `impureFakeDerivations` is empty [still needs to be handled](https://github.com/nix-community/dream2nix/actions/runs/3047009661/jobs/4952951206#step:5:399).
We should probably also generate a fake `devShell` alongside the fake package, allowing us to raise an error if it is evaluated hinting about `resolveImpure`
I'm not opposed to removing the custom sanitizing. I just thought, that with `-babel-runtime` it might not be clear on first glance if this is a namespaced package or a...
OK, I'm fine with removing the use of sanitizDerivationName.
> this made me wonder how dream2nix currently supports local tarballs or would plan to support it without IFDs. We already do IFD to parse the `.cabal` file. We use...
> Am I correct in thinking this is due to nix having no support built in for yaml parsing? .cabal uses its own language. Yaml support would not help for...
Thanks for pointing this out. It seems like the `nix flake check` issue is nothing we can fix in dream2nix. We'll have to wait for the upstream fix. Anyways, we...
Yeah several people already ran into that kind of problem. We should make source isolation optional, so sub-packages can access each others source.
@fufexan I created #307 with some more description on what needs to be done here. Feel free to reply on that issue if something is not clear, or you need...
Sounds like a reasonable strategy to me. > Is there a way to get this information (which packages have overrides) from inside the builder? If not, would it be possible...