Update config.toml due to team refactor.

[ancostas]

What does this PR do?

Reflects a team name change and their new jira board for QA tasks.

Motivation

We want QA to continue happening for APM onboarding-related PRs.

Describe how to test/QA your changes

n/a

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

none

[bits-bot]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[agent-platform-auto-pr[bot]]

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 47753000 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:

• tests_deb-arm64-py3
• tests_deb-x64-py3
• tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
• tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
• tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
• tests_rpm-arm64-py3
• tests_rpm-x64-py3
• tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

[cit-pr-commenter[bot]]

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 767e8baa-65a1-4d6c-bc90-6b944ad85743 Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 928c5eac5f6f88128f8b6c76f3da02bc10f78af6 Comparison: f88302339fcb2003bd27454e566ee5d41115e523

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

• ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
• ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
• ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI	trials	links
➖	pycheck_lots_of_tags	% cpu utilization	+2.29	[-0.16, +4.75]	1	Logs
➖	basic_py_check	% cpu utilization	+1.87	[-0.82, +4.55]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_syslog_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.82	[+0.75, +0.89]	1	Logs
➖	file_tree	memory utilization	+0.13	[-0.00, +0.25]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.03	[-0.15, +0.20]	1	Logs
➖	idle	memory utilization	+0.02	[-0.02, +0.07]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle	memory utilization	+0.02	[-0.03, +0.06]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	egress throughput	+0.01	[-0.24, +0.25]	1	Logs
➖	tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude	ingress throughput	+0.00	[-0.01, +0.01]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.00	[-0.49, +0.48]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.01	[-0.23, +0.21]	1	Logs
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api	ingress throughput	-0.01	[-0.09, +0.06]	1	Logs
➖	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	egress throughput	-0.03	[-0.36, +0.30]	1	Logs
➖	otel_to_otel_logs	ingress throughput	-0.20	[-1.00, +0.61]	1	Logs
➖	idle_all_features	memory utilization	-0.42	[-0.53, -0.32]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory utilization	-0.82	[-0.92, -0.72]	1	Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖	uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu	% cpu utilization	-2.23	[-2.95, -1.52]	1	Logs

Bounds Checks

perf	experiment	bounds_check_name	replicates_passed
✅	file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency	memory_usage	10/10
✅	idle	memory_usage	10/10
✅	idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10
✅	quality_gate_idle	memory_usage	10/10
✅	quality_gate_idle_all_features	memory_usage	10/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

[ancostas]

/merge

[dd-devflow[bot]]

:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 23m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!