datadog-agent
datadog-agent copied to clipboard
discovery: Allow delta for create time check
What does this PR do?
The current time checks sometimes fail due to a one second diff in the expected and actual values.
The value returned by proc.CreateTime() can vary between invocations since the BootTime (used internally in proc.CreateTime()) can vary when the version of BootTimeWithContext which uses /proc/uptime is active in gopsutil (either on Docker, or even outside of it due to a bug fixed in v4.24.8: https://github.com/shirou/gopsutil/commit/aa0b73dc6d5669de5bc9483c0655b1f9446317a9).
This is due to an inherent race since the code in BootTimeWithContext substracts the uptime of the host from the current time, and there can be in theory an unbounded amount of time between the read of /proc/uptime and the retrieval of the current time. Allow a 10 second diff as a reasonable value.
Motivation
Additional Notes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Test changes on VM
Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:
inv create-vm --pipeline-id=44453259 --os-family=ubuntu
Note: This applies to commit 69626eb8
Regression Detector
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 008cc7a5-07f9-48a4-b0e4-fba0b896e6a8 Metrics dashboard Target profiles
Baseline: 816693f1296c07b202e401c6bbb6eb5a15ca1dd9 Comparison: 69626eb8b47b8607dec78494ccc6b646437c2082
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.14 | [+0.37, +1.91] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.49 | [-0.33, +1.31] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.29 | [+0.18, +0.40] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.31 | [-0.35, -0.27] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | -0.47 | [-3.06, +2.11] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.65 | [-0.70, -0.60] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -1.28 | [-4.12, +1.57] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | idle | memory_usage | 7/10 |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue
The median merge time in main is 23m.
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!