datadog-agent
datadog-agent copied to clipboard
Bump github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go from 0.3.64 to 0.3.70
Bumps github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go from 0.3.64 to 0.3.70.
Release notes
Sourced from github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go's releases.
v0.3.70
What's Changed
- Improve example inferring with JSON support and type cohesion by
@vearutopin swaggest/jsonschema-go#114Full Changelog: https://github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go/compare/v0.3.69...v0.3.70
v0.3.69
What's Changed
- Improve interface assertions to allow val/ptr receivers without data loss by
@vearutopin swaggest/jsonschema-go#112Full Changelog: https://github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go/compare/v0.3.68...v0.3.69
v0.3.68
What's Changed
- Fix value method call on nil pointer by
@vearutopin swaggest/jsonschema-go#111Full Changelog: https://github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go/compare/v0.3.67...v0.3.68
v0.3.67
What's Changed
- Skip def name for a func type that may return different schemas by
@vearutopin swaggest/jsonschema-go#109- Fix default parsing by
@vearutopin swaggest/jsonschema-go#110Full Changelog: https://github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go/compare/v0.3.66...v0.3.67
v0.3.66
What's Changed
- Use type string for encoding.TextMarshaler by
@vearutopin swaggest/jsonschema-go#108Full Changelog: https://github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go/compare/v0.3.65...v0.3.66
v0.3.65
What's Changed
- Update CI by
@vearutopin swaggest/jsonschema-go#106- Optionally expose embedded structs with allOf by
@vearutopin swaggest/jsonschema-go#107Full Changelog: https://github.com/swaggest/jsonschema-go/compare/v0.3.64...v0.3.65
Commits
524f24bImprove example inferring with JSON support and type cohesion (#114)9575eb9Improve interface assertions to allow val/ptr receivers without data loss (#112)fbc1e0dFix value method call on nil pointer (#111)2d5f6b0Fix default parsing (#110)57ddbd6Skip def name for a func type that may return different schemas (#109)ee6e1beUse type string for encoding.TextMarshaler (#108)8eee225Optionally expose embedded structs with allOf (#107)04e0738Update CI (#106)- See full diff in compare view
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
Test changes on VM
Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:
inv create-vm --pipeline-id=30050071 --os-family=ubuntu
Regression Detector
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 1367d268-2463-4aa2-b3e1-be9c9fae9e04 Baseline: f868170b123898186b1eac1491d35f71d94a808b Comparison: 7ab25ccd67d5f7d08db8d21dd73dd029bcc5d337
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.95 | [-6.57, +4.66] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +1.50 | [+1.36, +1.64] |
| ➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | +1.05 | [-1.50, +3.60] |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.40 | [-0.05, +0.84] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | +0.18 | [+0.13, +0.23] |
| ➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | +0.12 | [+0.07, +0.16] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [+0.00, +0.03] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.20, +0.20] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.04, +0.03] |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.12, +0.07] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.07 | [-0.12, -0.01] |
| ➖ | pycheck_1000_100byte_tags | % cpu utilization | -0.30 | [-5.23, +4.64] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.31 | [-3.26, +2.64] |
| ➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.47 | [-0.50, -0.43] |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.95 | [-6.57, +4.66] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
@dependabot rebase
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready
This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue
The median merge time in main is 27m.
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!