datadog-agent
datadog-agent copied to clipboard
Add Windows MSI E2E test for custom install paths
What does this PR do?
Add Windows MSI E2E test for custom install paths
Adds an AgentInstallPath
parameter to the E2E AgentClient
Motivation
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/WINA-507
Additional Notes
seems like after https://github.com/DataDog/test-infra-definitions/pull/675 we might be able to include the agent install path in the agent.HostAgentOutput
, making it available for when components.RemoteHostAgent
is created.
marked draft since this PR is stacked on pending PRs
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 1382db6e-ac36-4c54-8c09-a27c9feb83af Baseline: c221f839802de34c89f5b6454a7e2ac675863ea5 Comparison: 02924fc5b5e19ea84f11dcd5ecbda74796f70efc
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true
are ignored.
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.03 | [-6.59, +6.52] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | +1.85 | [-0.44, +4.15] |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +1.22 | [+0.58, +1.86] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.88 | [-0.56, +2.32] |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.54 | [+0.46, +0.62] |
➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [+0.02, +0.04] |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.04, +0.03] |
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.03 | [-6.59, +6.52] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | -0.04 | [-0.07, -0.01] |
➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | -0.05 | [-0.08, -0.01] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.08 | [-0.11, -0.04] |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.14 | [-0.17, -0.10] |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.23 | [-0.28, -0.17] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
[Fast Unit Tests Report]
On pipeline 31640593 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:
Jobs:
- tests_deb-arm64-py3
- tests_deb-x64-py3
- tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
- tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
- tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
- tests_rpm-arm64-py3
- tests_rpm-x64-py3
- tests_windows-x64
If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-developer-experience
Test changes on VM
Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:
inv create-vm --pipeline-id=31640593 --os-family=ubuntu
Regression Detector
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 3829ec33-04f7-4360-8754-ce8e417697ac Baseline: 58b3776f8fdc8673f58679349f561ae454c59a86 Comparison: 8c6ae7a8b6880e47a916a173be8057dc429a4c9d
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true
are ignored.
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | +0.69 | [-4.84, +6.22] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | +0.94 | [-1.49, +3.37] |
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | +0.69 | [-4.84, +6.22] |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.27 | [-0.17, +0.71] |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.07 | [+0.04, +0.10] |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.03, +0.15] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.06 | [-2.78, +2.90] |
➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.03, +0.03] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.20, +0.20] |
➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | -0.01 | [-0.05, +0.03] |
➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.08, -0.00] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.22 | [-0.26, -0.18] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | -0.37 | [-0.41, -0.32] |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.49 | [-0.58, -0.39] |
➖ | pycheck_1000_100byte_tags | % cpu utilization | -3.02 | [-7.85, +1.80] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue
Pull request added to the queue.
This build is going to start soon! (estimated merge in less than 23m)
Use /merge -c
to cancel this operation!