datadog-agent
datadog-agent copied to clipboard
refactor for readibility
- change read only vars to const
- pull out methods to keep same abstraction level for readability
- add debug log when
DD_EXPERIMENTAL_ENABLE_PROXY
is ignore for appsec proxy
Serverless Benchmark Results
BenchmarkStartEndInvocation
comparison between 3bdc4d5f770a8c5cda447784815eb24107a3647d and b4d454bb5295bd1b5db5c5cbed7b67b93d160884.
tl;dr
-
Skim down the
vs base
column in each chart. If there is a~
, then there was no statistically significant change to the benchmark. Otherwise, ensure the estimated percent change is either negative or very small. -
The last row of each chart is the
geomean
. Ensure this percentage is either negative or very small.
What is this benchmarking?
The BenchmarkStartEndInvocation
compares the amount of time it takes to call the start-invocation
and end-invocation
endpoints. For universal instrumentation languages (Dotnet, Golang, Java, Ruby), this represents the majority of the duration overhead added by our tracing layer.
The benchmark is run using a large variety of lambda request payloads. In the charts below, there is one row for each event payload type.
How do I interpret these charts?
The charts below comes from benchstat
. They represent the statistical change in duration (sec/op), memory overhead (B/op), and allocations (allocs/op).
The benchstat docs explain how to interpret these charts.
Before the comparison table, we see common file-level configuration. If there are benchmarks with different configuration (for example, from different packages), benchstat will print separate tables for each configuration.
The table then compares the two input files for each benchmark. It shows the median and 95% confidence interval summaries for each benchmark before and after the change, and an A/B comparison under "vs base". ... The p-value measures how likely it is that any differences were due to random chance (i.e., noise). The "~" means benchstat did not detect a statistically significant difference between the two inputs. ...
Note that "statistically significant" is not the same as "large": with enough low-noise data, even very small changes can be distinguished from noise and considered statistically significant. It is, of course, generally easier to distinguish large changes from noise.
Finally, the last row of the table shows the geometric mean of each column, giving an overall picture of how the benchmarks changed. Proportional changes in the geomean reflect proportional changes in the benchmarks. For example, given n benchmarks, if sec/op for one of them increases by a factor of 2, then the sec/op geomean will increase by a factor of ⁿ√2.
Benchmark stats
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/serverless/daemon
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
│ baseline/benchmark.log │ current/benchmark.log │
│ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │
api-gateway-appsec.json 87.92µ ± 4% 92.63µ ± 6% +5.35% (p=0.003 n=10)
api-gateway-kong-appsec.json 65.77µ ± 3% 71.19µ ± 1% +8.24% (p=0.000 n=10)
api-gateway-kong.json 68.25µ ± 3% 68.88µ ± 1% ~ (p=0.089 n=10)
api-gateway-non-proxy-async.json 105.0µ ± 2% 109.0µ ± 1% +3.74% (p=0.000 n=10)
api-gateway-non-proxy.json 104.1µ ± 3% 108.3µ ± 1% +3.98% (p=0.000 n=10)
api-gateway-websocket-connect.json 68.53µ ± 1% 70.40µ ± 1% +2.73% (p=0.000 n=10)
api-gateway-websocket-default.json 61.58µ ± 3% 63.62µ ± 1% +3.31% (p=0.000 n=10)
api-gateway-websocket-disconnect.json 62.41µ ± 2% 64.49µ ± 3% +3.33% (p=0.000 n=10)
api-gateway.json 116.2µ ± 1% 119.0µ ± 1% +2.40% (p=0.000 n=10)
application-load-balancer.json 63.16µ ± 2% 64.24µ ± 1% +1.72% (p=0.003 n=10)
cloudfront.json 48.82µ ± 3% 49.54µ ± 4% ~ (p=0.089 n=10)
cloudwatch-events.json 39.00µ ± 1% 39.08µ ± 1% ~ (p=0.869 n=10)
cloudwatch-logs.json 66.36µ ± 2% 67.35µ ± 2% +1.49% (p=0.043 n=10)
custom.json 30.62µ ± 3% 31.45µ ± 1% +2.71% (p=0.009 n=10)
dynamodb.json 96.09µ ± 1% 97.44µ ± 1% +1.40% (p=0.000 n=10)
empty.json 29.47µ ± 2% 29.88µ ± 1% +1.39% (p=0.023 n=10)
eventbridge-custom.json 42.46µ ± 4% 43.32µ ± 2% +2.04% (p=0.009 n=10)
http-api.json 72.98µ ± 2% 74.86µ ± 1% +2.59% (p=0.000 n=10)
kinesis-batch.json 72.53µ ± 2% 74.20µ ± 2% +2.31% (p=0.019 n=10)
kinesis.json 54.11µ ± 2% 56.23µ ± 2% +3.91% (p=0.000 n=10)
s3.json 60.19µ ± 2% 62.47µ ± 2% +3.79% (p=0.000 n=10)
sns-batch.json 93.97µ ± 3% 94.94µ ± 1% +1.03% (p=0.023 n=10)
sns.json 64.99µ ± 2% 67.55µ ± 2% +3.93% (p=0.000 n=10)
snssqs.json 106.6µ ± 1% 110.8µ ± 1% +3.92% (p=0.000 n=10)
snssqs_no_dd_context.json 99.49µ ± 1% 104.91µ ± 1% +5.46% (p=0.000 n=10)
sqs-aws-header.json 56.05µ ± 4% 57.30µ ± 2% +2.22% (p=0.000 n=10)
sqs-batch.json 93.20µ ± 2% 98.61µ ± 2% +5.80% (p=0.000 n=10)
sqs.json 66.86µ ± 1% 72.75µ ± 4% +8.81% (p=0.000 n=10)
sqs_no_dd_context.json 61.18µ ± 2% 64.06µ ± 2% +4.71% (p=0.000 n=10)
geomean 67.06µ 69.24µ +3.25%
│ baseline/benchmark.log │ current/benchmark.log │
│ B/op │ B/op vs base │
api-gateway-appsec.json 36.96Ki ± 0% 36.96Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.324 n=10)
api-gateway-kong-appsec.json 26.62Ki ± 0% 26.63Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.492 n=10)
api-gateway-kong.json 24.12Ki ± 0% 24.11Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.541 n=10)
api-gateway-non-proxy-async.json 47.77Ki ± 0% 47.77Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.590 n=10)
api-gateway-non-proxy.json 46.97Ki ± 0% 46.98Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.315 n=10)
api-gateway-websocket-connect.json 25.20Ki ± 0% 25.20Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.896 n=10)
api-gateway-websocket-default.json 21.10Ki ± 0% 21.10Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.697 n=10)
api-gateway-websocket-disconnect.json 20.88Ki ± 0% 20.88Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.517 n=10)
api-gateway.json 49.29Ki ± 0% 49.29Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.565 n=10)
application-load-balancer.json 22.07Ki ± 0% 22.07Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.897 n=10)
cloudfront.json 17.40Ki ± 0% 17.40Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.183 n=10)
cloudwatch-events.json 11.46Ki ± 0% 11.44Ki ± 0% -0.14% (p=0.002 n=10)
cloudwatch-logs.json 53.11Ki ± 0% 53.12Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.159 n=10)
custom.json 9.479Ki ± 0% 9.474Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.616 n=10)
dynamodb.json 40.42Ki ± 0% 40.41Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.987 n=10)
empty.json 9.033Ki ± 0% 9.024Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.565 n=10)
eventbridge-custom.json 13.16Ki ± 0% 13.16Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.725 n=10)
http-api.json 23.46Ki ± 0% 23.42Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.362 n=10)
kinesis-batch.json 26.76Ki ± 0% 26.79Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.190 n=10)
kinesis.json 17.55Ki ± 0% 17.57Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.393 n=10)
s3.json 20.08Ki ± 0% 20.09Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.447 n=10)
sns-batch.json 38.42Ki ± 0% 38.40Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.753 n=10)
sns.json 23.74Ki ± 0% 23.74Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.953 n=10)
snssqs.json 49.33Ki ± 0% 49.38Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.086 n=10)
snssqs_no_dd_context.json 44.55Ki ± 0% 44.60Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.052 n=10)
sqs-aws-header.json 18.60Ki ± 0% 18.65Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.105 n=10)
sqs-batch.json 41.36Ki ± 0% 41.41Ki ± 0% +0.14% (p=0.009 n=10)
sqs.json 25.30Ki ± 0% 25.31Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.754 n=10)
sqs_no_dd_context.json 20.44Ki ± 0% 20.47Ki ± 0% ~ (p=0.218 n=10)
geomean 25.39Ki 25.40Ki +0.03%
│ baseline/benchmark.log │ current/benchmark.log │
│ allocs/op │ allocs/op vs base │
api-gateway-appsec.json 628.0 ± 0% 629.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.656 n=10)
api-gateway-kong-appsec.json 487.0 ± 0% 487.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
api-gateway-kong.json 465.0 ± 0% 465.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
api-gateway-non-proxy-async.json 724.0 ± 0% 724.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
api-gateway-non-proxy.json 715.0 ± 0% 715.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
api-gateway-websocket-connect.json 452.0 ± 0% 452.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
api-gateway-websocket-default.json 378.0 ± 0% 378.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
api-gateway-websocket-disconnect.json 368.0 ± 0% 368.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
api-gateway.json 789.0 ± 0% 789.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
application-load-balancer.json 351.0 ± 0% 351.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
cloudfront.json 282.0 ± 0% 283.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.179 n=10)
cloudwatch-events.json 219.0 ± 0% 219.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
cloudwatch-logs.json 214.0 ± 0% 214.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
custom.json 167.0 ± 0% 167.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹
dynamodb.json 588.0 ± 0% 588.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.628 n=10)
empty.json 158.0 ± 1% 158.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.303 n=10)
eventbridge-custom.json 252.5 ± 0% 252.5 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
http-api.json 431.0 ± 0% 430.5 ± 0% ~ (p=0.082 n=10)
kinesis-batch.json 389.0 ± 0% 390.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.593 n=10)
kinesis.json 284.0 ± 0% 284.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.777 n=10)
s3.json 356.5 ± 0% 357.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.584 n=10)
sns-batch.json 454.0 ± 0% 454.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.377 n=10)
sns.json 322.0 ± 0% 322.0 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10)
snssqs.json 423.0 ± 0% 423.5 ± 0% ~ (p=0.097 n=10)
snssqs_no_dd_context.json 398.0 ± 0% 399.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.070 n=10)
sqs-aws-header.json 272.0 ± 0% 273.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.225 n=10)
sqs-batch.json 502.0 ± 0% 503.0 ± 0% +0.20% (p=0.005 n=10)
sqs.json 350.0 ± 1% 350.0 ± 1% ~ (p=0.917 n=10)
sqs_no_dd_context.json 323.5 ± 0% 324.0 ± 0% ~ (p=0.225 n=10)
geomean 374.6 374.8 +0.06%
¹ all samples are equal
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 2fe7c384-2112-4fb3-8a19-ace9993309e6 Baseline: 3bdc4d5f770a8c5cda447784815eb24107a3647d Comparison: fd13d1f212f9a962f40eb7faaef874950c23325d Total CPUs: 7
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
Experiments with missing or malformed data
- basic_py_check
Usually, this warning means that there is no usable optimization goal data for that experiment, which could be a result of misconfiguration.
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true
are ignored.
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | +0.10 | [-6.44, +6.64] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.63 | [-0.80, +2.05] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | +0.19 | [+0.16, +0.22] |
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | +0.10 | [-6.44, +6.64] |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.05 | [-0.00, +0.11] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | +0.02 | [-0.02, +0.06] |
➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.01] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.10, +0.01] |
➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | -0.15 | [-0.18, -0.11] |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.23 | [-0.26, -0.19] |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -0.65 | [-1.28, -0.03] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".