[SBOM] Rebase on 'main' trivy branch
What does this PR do?
This change bumps Trivy version to upstream 2024-02-28.
Motivation
Additional Notes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Go Package Import Differences
This comment was omitted because it was over 65,536 characters. Please check the Gitlab Job logs to see its output.
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: baa0a106-949d-4763-b04f-cced846cbb07 Baseline: 6964da53aae4a788c540294470fa574c6539710c Comparison: bfda5ec260fff351ce0c1f750e79c44b60f21362
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
Experiments with missing or malformed data
- basic_py_check
Usually, this warning means that there is no usable optimization goal data for that experiment, which could be a result of misconfiguration.
Significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | file_tree | memory utilization | +9.61 | [+9.53, +9.69] |
| ❌ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | +8.96 | [+8.93, +9.00] |
| ❌ | idle | memory utilization | +8.24 | [+8.21, +8.28] |
| ❌ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | +8.08 | [+8.04, +8.12] |
| ❌ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | +8.04 | [+8.00, +8.07] |
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -5.20 | [-11.75, +1.36] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | file_tree | memory utilization | +9.61 | [+9.53, +9.69] |
| ❌ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | +8.96 | [+8.93, +9.00] |
| ❌ | idle | memory utilization | +8.24 | [+8.21, +8.28] |
| ❌ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | +8.08 | [+8.04, +8.12] |
| ❌ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | +8.04 | [+8.00, +8.07] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.01, +0.03] |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.06, +0.01] |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.32 | [-0.37, -0.26] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.93 | [-2.34, +0.49] |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -1.05 | [-1.69, -0.42] |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -5.20 | [-11.75, +1.36] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
I had to increase dogstatsd's MAX_BINARY_SIZE from 38 MB to 39 MB.
Otherwrise, I get this error:
DogStatsD static build size too big: 38979.265625 kB
/trigger-ci --variable RUN_ALL_BUILDS=true --variable RUN_KITCHEN_TESTS=true --variable RUN_E2E_TESTS=auto
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue
Pull request added to the queue.
This build is going to start soon! (estimated merge in less than 28m)
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!
:x: MergeQueue
Build pipeline failed for a4f1c8a
You should have a look at the pipeline and see if the build failed because of your changes or not. When you are ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
⚠️ Do NOT retry failed jobs directly.
They were executed on a temporary branch created by the merge queue. If you retry them, they are going to fail because the branch no longer exists.
If you need support, contact us on Slack #ci-interfaces with those details!
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue
This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue
Added to the queue.
This build is going to start soon! (estimated merge in less than 27m)
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!