datadog-agent
datadog-agent copied to clipboard
send CWS QA cards to CWS project, Agent component
What does this PR do?
We are migrating our Jira cards out of the common SEC projects, into a new CWS one. This PR fixes the configuration to send QA cards to the correct location.
Motivation
Additional Notes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: 0d09c98e-72bf-456c-9f29-004f43541d11 Baseline: ea98ae0218b75a6d3ea65a94991b608d44dfb7c5 Comparison: fe63c9f290f5fdb3db11780ab77d2539df14b927 Total CPUs: 7
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
Experiments with missing or malformed data
- basic_py_check
Usually, this warning means that there is no usable optimization goal data for that experiment, which could be a result of misconfiguration.
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.61 | [-7.15, +5.93] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.94 | [-0.50, +2.39] |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.67 | [+0.05, +1.29] |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.46 | [+0.40, +0.51] |
| ➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | +0.37 | [+0.34, +0.41] |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.31 | [+0.23, +0.39] |
| ➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.06 | [+0.02, +0.09] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [+0.01, +0.02] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.02, +0.03] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | -0.03 | [-0.07, -0.00] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.21 | [-0.24, -0.17] |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -0.61 | [-7.15, +5.93] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue
Pull request added to the queue.
This build is next! (estimated merge in less than 50m)
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!