datadog-agent icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
datadog-agent copied to clipboard

Direct call to gh data to decrease usage of API

Open chouetz opened this issue 1 year ago • 1 comments

What does this PR do?

Replace call to gh cli by usage of the content of gh event.

Motivation

Reduce call to the API (rate limitation). Now possible because MQ is not adding labels anymore, so this workflow is triggered in label addition/deletion

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

chouetz avatar Feb 20 '24 14:02 chouetz

Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 164f3692-f1d0-44da-8b01-bfc494a93843 Baseline: d980332f62316915eb0205ece9e8357bfcafa6d2 Comparison: f0ed17a8e33d03b346838efce403bfdde00eab58 Total CPUs: 7

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

Experiments with missing or malformed data

  • basic_py_check

Usually, this warning means that there is no usable optimization goal data for that experiment, which could be a result of misconfiguration.

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
file_to_blackhole % cpu utilization -0.50 [-7.08, +6.08]

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
file_tree memory utilization +0.75 [+0.66, +0.83]
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.36 [-0.27, +0.98]
process_agent_standard_check_with_stats memory utilization +0.07 [+0.04, +0.10]
process_agent_real_time_mode memory utilization +0.04 [+0.01, +0.07]
trace_agent_msgpack ingress throughput +0.01 [+0.01, +0.02]
trace_agent_json ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.03, +0.03]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00]
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00]
idle memory utilization -0.23 [-0.26, -0.21]
process_agent_standard_check memory utilization -0.48 [-0.52, -0.44]
file_to_blackhole % cpu utilization -0.50 [-7.08, +6.08]
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.93 [-0.98, -0.87]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -1.13 [-2.56, +0.29]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

pr-commenter[bot] avatar Feb 20 '24 16:02 pr-commenter[bot]

/merge

chouetz avatar Feb 26 '24 09:02 chouetz

:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue

Pull request added to the queue.

There are 2 builds ahead! (estimated merge in less than 49m)

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

dd-devflow[bot] avatar Feb 26 '24 09:02 dd-devflow[bot]