datadog-agent
datadog-agent copied to clipboard
[gitlab] Fix e2e_installer_test_junit_upload job never running
What does this PR do?
Updates the rules of the e2e_installer_test_junit_upload so that it actually runs.
Motivation
The current rules:
rules:
- !reference [.except_mergequeue]
expand to:
rules:
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
which means the job is never run.
Additional Notes
n/a
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Check the presence of e2e_installer_test_junit_upload on the PR pipeline.
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here
Regression Detector Results
Run ID: ad25d995-383c-4ef4-9963-0f6cd37acf9a Baseline: 21213ac863f4c6c5c430f4f93f76810788b27820 Comparison: 464e3ede76c98a0b0d0c678d2b7e6ec0a5e91735 Total CPUs: 7
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
No significant changes in experiment optimization goals
Confidence level: 90.00% Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
Experiments ignored for regressions
Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -1.10 | [-7.60, +5.39] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.27 | [+0.25, +0.30] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | +0.16 | [+0.10, +0.21] |
| ➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | +0.13 | [+0.09, +0.16] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [+0.01, +0.03] |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.04, +0.07] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.00, +0.00] |
| ➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.03, +0.02] |
| ➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.04 | [-0.09, +0.01] |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.34 | [-0.45, -0.22] |
| ➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -0.49 | [-1.09, +0.11] |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | -1.10 | [-7.60, +5.39] |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -1.89 | [-3.27, -0.51] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/merge
:steam_locomotive: MergeQueue
Pull request added to the queue.
This build is going to start soon! (estimated merge in less than 49m)
Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!