datadog-agent
datadog-agent copied to clipboard
add http monitor tests
What does this PR do?
- The PR adds a UT for the HTTP monitoring package.
- The first scenario is slow response from a server with different "agent" configuration for cleaning IDLE connections.
- The second scenario is requests & responses with actual bodies
- The third scenario is incomplete requests, which we make sure don't deny us from capturing other requests
- In the PR I had to convert 2 hard coded values into configurable values (
http_map_cleaner_interval_in_s,http_idle_connection_ttl_in_s), for both of them the hard coded values have become the default values.
Motivation
Testing a complex scenario for the eBPF agent.
Additional Notes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Reviewer's Checklist
- [ ] If known, an appropriate milestone has been selected; otherwise the
Triagemilestone is set. - [ ] Use the
major_changelabel if your change either has a major impact on the code base, is impacting multiple teams or is changing important well-established internals of the Agent. This label will be use during QA to make sure each team pay extra attention to the changed behavior. For any customer facing change use a releasenote. - [ ] A release note has been added or the
changelog/no-changeloglabel has been applied. - [ ] Changed code has automated tests for its functionality.
- [ ] Adequate QA/testing plan information is provided if the
qa/skip-qalabel is not applied. - [ ] At least one
team/..label has been applied, indicating the team(s) that should QA this change. - [ ] If applicable, docs team has been notified or an issue has been opened on the documentation repo.
- [ ] If applicable, the
need-change/operatorandneed-change/helmlabels have been applied. - [ ] If applicable, the
k8s/<min-version>label, indicating the lowest Kubernetes version compatible with this feature. - [ ] If applicable, the config template has been updated.