BayesPrism
BayesPrism copied to clipboard
Error in checkForRemoteErrors(val) : one node produced an error: subscript out of bounds
I'm bulk RNA-seq data and sc-RNA data with Ensembl Ids. And using cell type Fibroblasts.
> dim(bk.dat)
[1] 546 19988
> dim(sc.dat)
[1] 1159 19828
> sort(table(cell.type.labels))
Fibroblast
1159
> sort(table(cell.state.labels))
cell.state.labels
fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0
83 148 177 237 514
Using the above data Constructed prism object like below:
> myPrism <- new.prism(
+ reference=sc.dat.filtered.pc,
+ mixture=bk.dat,
+ input.type="count.matrix",
+ cell.type.labels = cell.type.labels,
+ cell.state.labels = cell.state.labels,
+ key="Fibroblast",
+ outlier.cut=0.01,
+ outlier.fraction=0.1,
+ )
number of cells in each cell state
cell.state.labels
fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0
83 148 177 237 514
Number of outlier genes filtered from mixture = 9
Aligning reference and mixture...
Nornalizing reference...
Warning message:
In validityMethod(object) : Warning: pseudo.min does not match min(phi)
Then ran the Bayesprism like below:
> bp.res <- run.prism(prism = myPrism, n.cores=50)
Run Gibbs sampling...
Current time: 2022-12-02 21:03:14
Estimated time to complete: 1hrs 2mins
Estimated finishing time: 2022-12-02 22:04:15
Start run...
Explicit sfStop() is missing: stop now.
Stopping cluster
snowfall 1.84-6.2 initialized (using snow 0.4-4): parallel execution on 50 CPUs.
Stopping cluster
Update the reference matrix ...
snowfall 1.84-6.2 initialized (using snow 0.4-4): parallel execution on 50 CPUs.
Error in checkForRemoteErrors(val) :
one node produced an error: subscript out of bounds
So, first I saw Explicit sfStop() is missing: stop now.
then at the end of the run I saw the following error:
Error in checkForRemoteErrors(val) :
one node produced an error: subscript out of bounds
Could you please help, how to resolve this error? thank you.
Thank you for your interest in our work.
cell.type.labels should be your target granularity of cell types, and has to be greater than one type. In your case, I believe you should use "fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0" as cell types.
Best,
Tinyi
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 4:22 PM venkan @.***> wrote:
I'm bulk RNA-seq data and sc-RNA data with Ensembl Ids. And using cell type Fibroblasts.
dim(bk.dat) [1] 546 19988
dim(sc.dat) [1] 1159 19828
sort(table(cell.type.labels)) Fibroblast 1159 sort(table(cell.state.labels)) cell.state.labels fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0 83 148 177 237 514
Using the above data Constructed prism object like below:
myPrism <- new.prism(
- reference=sc.dat.filtered.pc,
- mixture=bk.dat,
- input.type="count.matrix",
- cell.type.labels = cell.type.labels,
- cell.state.labels = cell.state.labels,
- key="Fibroblast",
- outlier.cut=0.01,
outlier.fraction=0.1,
- ) number of cells in each cell state cell.state.labels fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0 83 148 177 237 514 Number of outlier genes filtered from mixture = 9 Aligning reference and mixture... Nornalizing reference... Warning message: In validityMethod(object) : Warning: pseudo.min does not match min(phi)
Then ran the Bayesprism like below:
bp.res <- run.prism(prism = myPrism, n.cores=50) Run Gibbs sampling... Current time: 2022-12-02 21:03:14 Estimated time to complete: 1hrs 2mins Estimated finishing time: 2022-12-02 22:04:15 Start run... Explicit sfStop() is missing: stop now.
Stopping cluster
snowfall 1.84-6.2 initialized (using snow 0.4-4): parallel execution on 50 CPUs.
Stopping cluster
Update the reference matrix ... snowfall 1.84-6.2 initialized (using snow 0.4-4): parallel execution on 50 CPUs.
Error in checkForRemoteErrors(val) : one node produced an error: subscript out of bounds
So, first I saw Explicit sfStop() is missing: stop now. then at the end of the run I saw the following error:
Error in checkForRemoteErrors(val) : one node produced an error: subscript out of bounds
Could you please help, how to resolve this error? thank you.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Danko-Lab/BayesPrism/issues/23, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4NHSYFRNIAF4YIBY6GZELWLJSCNANCNFSM6AAAAAASSJ3ACA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Thank you for your reply. I have cell type
only Fibroblasts
.
If I give cell.type.labels
like fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0
then what should be cell.state.labels
?
same as cell type
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 6:10 AM venkan @.***> wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I have cell type only Fibroblasts.
If I give cell.type.labels like fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0 then what should be cell.state.labels?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Danko-Lab/BayesPrism/issues/23#issuecomment-1336136542, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4NHSYL4K3YDTIIA7ONEGDWLMTDFANCNFSM6AAAAAASSJ3ACA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
Thank you again. Could you please check this and tell me whether this is right?
As you said, I gave both cell.type and cell.state labels same:
> sort(table(cell.type.labels))
cell.type.labels
fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0
83 148 177 237 514
> sort(table(cell.state.labels))
cell.state.labels
fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0
83 148 177 237 514
Then Constructed prism object:
myPrism <- new.prism(
reference=sc.dat.filtered.pc,
mixture=bk.dat,
input.type="count.matrix",
cell.type.labels = cell.type.labels,
cell.state.labels = cell.state.labels,
key=NULL,
outlier.cut=0.01,
outlier.fraction=0.1,
)
Then ran Bayesprism:
bp.res <- run.prism(prism = myPrism, n.cores=50)
bp.res
It looks like below:
> bp.res
Input prism info:
Cell states in each cell type:
$`fb-1`
[1] "fb-1"
$`fb-2`
[1] "fb-2"
$`fb-3`
[1] "fb-3"
$`fb-4`
[1] "fb-4"
$`fb-0`
[1] "fb-0"
Identifier of the malignant cell type: NA
Number of cell states: 5
Number of cell types: 5
Number of mixtures: 546
Number of genes: 18677
Initial cell type fractions:
fb-1 fb-2 fb-3 fb-4 fb-0
Min. 0.016 0.036 0.000 0.057 0.000
1st Qu. 0.084 0.283 0.021 0.344 0.069
Median 0.108 0.357 0.043 0.383 0.089
Mean 0.106 0.360 0.055 0.385 0.093
3rd Qu. 0.129 0.425 0.066 0.426 0.110
Max. 0.197 0.918 0.453 0.656 0.289
Updated cell type fractions:
fb-1 fb-2 fb-3 fb-4 fb-0
Min. 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.003 0.000
1st Qu. 0.084 0.278 0.000 0.337 0.036
Median 0.121 0.364 0.017 0.387 0.071
Mean 0.116 0.359 0.055 0.385 0.085
3rd Qu. 0.150 0.445 0.053 0.434 0.111
Max. 0.242 0.938 0.958 0.700 0.351
To get the count matrix Z
> Z.tumor <- get.exp(bp=bp.res, state.or.type="type")
> str(Z.tumor)
num [1:546, 1:18677, 1:5] 142.6 219.5 109.5 11.8 87.8 ...
- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 3
..$ : chr [1:546] "TCGA-CN-6997-01A" "TCGA-CR-6472-01A" "TCGA-BB-A5HU-01A" "TCGA-P3-A6T5-01A" ...
..$ : chr [1:18677] "ENSG00000000003" "ENSG00000000005" "ENSG00000000419" "ENSG00000000457" ...
..$ : chr [1:5] "fb-1" "fb-2" "fb-3" "fb-4" ...
Then I converted that to a dataframe:
> df <- as.data.frame(Z.tumor)
> head(df)[1:5,1:5]
ENSG00000000003.fb-1 ENSG00000000005.fb-1 ENSG00000000419.fb-1
TCGA-CN-6997-01A 142.556 0 998.272
TCGA-CR-6472-01A 219.524 0 403.528
TCGA-BB-A5HU-01A 109.548 0 344.892
TCGA-P3-A6T5-01A 11.792 0 416.628
TCGA-BA-4074-01A 87.844 0 575.504
ENSG00000000457.fb-1 ENSG00000000460.fb-1
TCGA-CN-6997-01A 142.268 97.808
TCGA-CR-6472-01A 86.876 92.448
TCGA-BB-A5HU-01A 47.872 29.688
TCGA-P3-A6T5-01A 66.704 31.804
TCGA-BA-4074-01A 33.956 29.468
Looks good to me. But it appears to me that you are trying to deconvolve TGCA tumor sample with only fibroblasts scRNA reference? BayesPrism requires a complete representation of cell types in the reference…
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 6:31 PM venkan @.***> wrote:
Thank you again. Could you please check this and tell me whether this is right?
As you said, I gave both cell.type and cell.state labels same:
sort(table(cell.type.labels)) cell.type.labels fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0 83 148 177 237 514 sort(table(cell.state.labels)) cell.state.labels fb-4 fb-1 fb-3 fb-2 fb-0 83 148 177 237 514
Then Constructed prism object:
myPrism <- new.prism( reference=sc.dat.filtered.pc, mixture=bk.dat, input.type="count.matrix", cell.type.labels = cell.type.labels, cell.state.labels = cell.state.labels, key=NULL, outlier.cut=0.01, outlier.fraction=0.1, )
Then ran Bayesprism:
bp.res <- run.prism(prism = myPrism, n.cores=50) bp.res
It looks like below:
bp.res Input prism info: Cell states in each cell type: $
fb-1
[1] "fb-1"$
fb-2
[1] "fb-2"$
fb-3
[1] "fb-3"$
fb-4
[1] "fb-4"$
fb-0
[1] "fb-0"Identifier of the malignant cell type: NA Number of cell states: 5 Number of cell types: 5 Number of mixtures: 546 Number of genes: 18677
Initial cell type fractions: fb-1 fb-2 fb-3 fb-4 fb-0 Min. 0.016 0.036 0.000 0.057 0.000 1st Qu. 0.084 0.283 0.021 0.344 0.069 Median 0.108 0.357 0.043 0.383 0.089 Mean 0.106 0.360 0.055 0.385 0.093 3rd Qu. 0.129 0.425 0.066 0.426 0.110 Max. 0.197 0.918 0.453 0.656 0.289 Updated cell type fractions: fb-1 fb-2 fb-3 fb-4 fb-0 Min. 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.003 0.000 1st Qu. 0.084 0.278 0.000 0.337 0.036 Median 0.121 0.364 0.017 0.387 0.071 Mean 0.116 0.359 0.055 0.385 0.085 3rd Qu. 0.150 0.445 0.053 0.434 0.111 Max. 0.242 0.938 0.958 0.700 0.351
To get the count matrix Z
Z.tumor <- get.exp(bp=bp.res, state.or.type="type") str(Z.tumor) num [1:546, 1:18677, 1:5] 142.6 219.5 109.5 11.8 87.8 ...
- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 3 ..$ : chr [1:546] "TCGA-CN-6997-01A" "TCGA-CR-6472-01A" "TCGA-BB-A5HU-01A" "TCGA-P3-A6T5-01A" ... ..$ : chr [1:18677] "ENSG00000000003" "ENSG00000000005" "ENSG00000000419" "ENSG00000000457" ... ..$ : chr [1:5] "fb-1" "fb-2" "fb-3" "fb-4" ...
Then I converted that to a dataframe:
df <- as.data.frame(Z.tumor) head(df)[1:5,1:5] ENSG00000000003.fb-1 ENSG00000000005.fb-1 ENSG00000000419.fb-1 TCGA-CN-6997-01A 142.556 0 998.272 TCGA-CR-6472-01A 219.524 0 403.528 TCGA-BB-A5HU-01A 109.548 0 344.892 TCGA-P3-A6T5-01A 11.792 0 416.628 TCGA-BA-4074-01A 87.844 0 575.504 ENSG00000000457.fb-1 ENSG00000000460.fb-1 TCGA-CN-6997-01A 142.268 97.808 TCGA-CR-6472-01A 86.876 92.448 TCGA-BB-A5HU-01A 47.872 29.688 TCGA-P3-A6T5-01A 66.704 31.804 TCGA-BA-4074-01A 33.956 29.468
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Danko-Lab/BayesPrism/issues/23#issuecomment-1336278188, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4NHS7ZHTQGZ4MCV35PY53WLPJ4JANCNFSM6AAAAAASSJ3ACA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
yes, actually I have only fibroblasts scRNA reference. So, using only that. I have other cell types like below:
B.cell Dendritic Endothelial Fibroblast Macrophage Mast myocyte T.cell
967 15 205 1159 133 87 39 645
but, I have cell.state.labelsfor only
Fibroblasts. Don't have any
cell.state.labelsfor other
cell.type.labels`. Do you think I can go forward with the above way in my previous comment?
You would need a complete representation for the cell types in your tumor mixture, i.e. including the malignant cells. Please refer to the tutorial and Q&A for the definition of cell state and cell type.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 7:55 PM venkan @.***> wrote:
yes, actually I have only fibroblasts scRNA reference. So, using only that. I have other cell types like below:
B.cell Dendritic Endothelial Fibroblast Macrophage Mast myocyte T.cell 967 15 205 1159 133 87 39 645
but, I have cell.state.labelsfor onlyFibroblasts. Don't have any cell.state.labelsfor othercell.type.labels`. Do you think I can go forward with the above way in my previous comment?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Danko-Lab/BayesPrism/issues/23#issuecomment-1336290062, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4NHS354DUANU3TQDDL4G3WLPTWVANCNFSM6AAAAAASSJ3ACA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>