DanielusG

Results 33 comments of DanielusG

Hi @rekram1-node I’ve seen the PR about “better interleaved thinking” (#5298 ) but I can confirm that it still doesn’t work on LiteLLM Proxy. Since I use many models from...

> there were 2 different interleaved thinking prs, what format does litellm expect? > > can u not define this in your opencode.json? we can add more mapping options but...

@rekram1-node I can confirm that the support for interleaving thinking with the parameter you implemented works by specifying the field `reasoning_details` or `reasoning_content`. My issue was that I was simply...