DangerousFreedom1984

So far I found three times in Borromean Signatures (which I believe that was all) and none in Bulletproofs (but I am very far from scanning the whole bulletproofs transactions).

@Mitchellpkt but I will give an update by the middle of the week. I was hoping that someone would precisely answer that so I would spare a bit of time...

**Wrong signatures in the blockchain** While scanning the blockchain with my reliable Python tools, as I am using the LibSodium library for all the crypto operations, I found a mismatch...

Yes, but I don't understand where the error originates. Do you know? Why and where exactly this happens?

Ok. Yeah, I don't see then how it could be exploited if it is deterministic. Thank you!

[Here](https://www.moneroinflation.com/static/data_py/report_scalars_df.pdf) is an update containing all the transactions presenting this behaviour.

I agree that it might be burning funds. But we don't really care about the person spending. The problem I see is that it damages the fungibility of other transactions....

Yes, you as a person have a direct incentive not to do it, I agree. But what if I want to attack the Monero network by compromising the fungibility? It...

Thanks for the answers. I agree with your points. I didn't mean to add this check for every transaction since the beginning, otherwise it would fail for the blocks listed...

> Interesting find @DangerousFreedom1984 good eye :) > > Could you share a few example transaction hashes? I want to take a peek at the data. Sure. Just look at...