[charts/redis-ha] fix: redis and haproxy and busybox image was migrated from docker hub to public ecr for docker hub rate limit
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue this PR fixes
(optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)
- fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist
[Place an '[x]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.]
- [x] DCO signed
- [x] Chart Version bumped
- [x] Variables are documented in the README.md
- [x] Title of the PR starts with chart name (e.g.
[stable/mychartname])
@kahirokunn I'm not seeing any mentions of this being an official migration?
https://hub.docker.com/_/redis
Can you throw me something confirming this as an official migration?
@DandyDeveloper https://aws.amazon.com/jp/blogs/news/docker-official-images-now-available-on-amazon-elastic-container-registry-public/
Is this information sufficient?
What about Google's cache proxy for DockerHub? But this is a bit specific to users for example I'm using my own docker registry docker.karimi.dev :) or some users bought docker hub account
@kahirokunn I'm gonna see if I can dig and find an official word that its right to use this. Sorry for the delay.
@DandyDeveloper I did find an official announcement from docker.
I think it's best to leave it to the default of docker.io/library to avoid confusion. Personally it makes no difference to me, but I do not believe public.ecr.aws/docker/library/ is widely known or adopted in the community yet.
If you are considering a rate limit, I would suggest using a registry that is mirrored by docker.io. AWS, GCP, GitHub, whatever, but a trusted and proven organization is preferred.
In fact I got stuck with docker.io's rate limit and failed in production.