Ajout de metrique dans AT et approche multiresolution. Noemie Tasca, …

[NoemieTasca]

[stagiaire de Jacques-Olivier Lachaud]

PR not ready yet. Working on it.

Thanks a lot for contributing to DGtalTools, before submitting your PR, please fill up the description and make sure that all checkboxes are checked.

PR Description

Metric : Taking into account the metric in the discrete formulation of Ambrosio-Tortorelli. Multiresolution : Adding a multi-scale resolution in image restoration using Ambrosio-Tortorelli.

Checklist

• [x] Doxygen documentation of the code completed (classes, methods, types, members...).
• [x] Main tool doxygen documentation (following existing documentation of DGtalTools documentation.
• [x] Check if it follows the tools structure described in CONTRIBUTING.md
• [ ] New entry in the ChangeLog.md added.
• [x] Update the readme with potentially a screenshot of the tools if it applies.
• [x] No warning raised in Debug cmake mode (otherwise, Travis C.I. will fail).

[JacquesOlivierLachaud]

Hi Noemie ! For the last three points, they are easily handled:

• ChangeLog.md : you can just edit the file, add your PR number and name and a short sentence describing your work.
• Readme.md: again, it is just editing the file and add a screenshot for marketing (not sure it is necessary since your tool produces the same output as at-u2-v0
• No warning in debug mode : you can toggle it on since the CI has passed. I'll have a look at your PR next week. Thanks

[kerautret]

Hi @NoemieTasca @JacquesOlivierLachaud do you think that it is ready for review ? (or better waiting after 1.0 ?)

[kerautret]

ping @JacquesOlivierLachaud can I review it ? I suppose yes since the check are greens ;)

[JacquesOlivierLachaud]

Honnestly I had completely forgotten this PR and even the commits I made. I think you can have a look. This code is sufficiently independent of other programs to be merged quite safely.

[JacquesOlivierLachaud]

I have to check this PR more. Noemie had a lot of weird problem when doing multi scale approaches. I do not know yet if it is a conceptual problem or simply a bug.

[kerautret]

@NoemieTasca since news changes with CLI prog options were made, to help I PR on your branch the merge: https://github.com/NoemieTasca/DGtalTools/pull/1 You can perhaps merge to simplify the review ? (the conflict was not very complicated) (CC @JacquesOlivierLachaud )

[kerautret]

In the PR I also apply new change with CL11 in link to previous PR.