Rahul Gupta
Rahul Gupta
Could we bring @dword-design PR back under a flag, please? This way it is not a breaking change and those who want can opt into this behaviour.
@dword-design Call me peculiar, but doing it with `\n` (which I do too) looks just ugly. Also, `string.dedent` proposal will work the way you are suggesting. A flag seems like...
\n\n @dword-design Sure, this is small potatos! I just find this funny that we should start writing like this.\n :)
@tidoust Thank you for a detailed answer. I could work with section numbering for now! Consider adding this to the docs (so that other don't waste time researching and experimenting...
@tidoust Thanks for the heads up! Much appreciated!!!
Please do! I don't like the formatting either, especially, since we (unlike you) mandate ALL CAPS use only, which is plenty clear. But that is the recommendation as it stands....
This is what I would like to eventually achieve: ``` MUST ```
> I'm not sure why you'd want that, but ok. It's what they are doing in the Solid project where I am contributing, they are very big on Linked-Data. But...
Also, what I am trying to achieve is this: [[RFC2046]](#), [Section 5.1](https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2046#section-5.1)