CurlyMoo

The switch bug requires a new PR. This PR should only be focused on a new contact element.

First of all, don't close the PR. Please do the PR according to the contribution guide. Also, don't merge the dev branch, but keep it plain IR branch.

> Unfortunately I am one week of now. Should I delete the PR and create a new one as soon as I am back home? Exactly what i do not...

Can you check the unittest for these devices. These do work, so we should test for faulty settings. Which means extending the PR with more extensive testing.

> Sorry, i dont have any of theese devices. The good thing is that the unit tests are all done without the actual devices but with the `i2c-stub` module. Just...

After struggling with the same issue i've decided to write my own webserver for the ESP8266. It can run in Async and Synced mode without recompiling and it uses a...

I don't quite see what controller values should be stored in an EEPROM or Flash. The statistics of the device itself maybe, and the settings are probably stored in an...

Time to close the issue 👍

This feature has been implemented in the fork by @IgorYbema

> Remember it is all open source and community driven so while talking about security issue, you could better spend time in making it better. I think we can settle...