Scott Sauyet

I'm an atheist and not involved in Church encoding. -- Scott

(Sorry for the slow reply: just back from vacation.) Yes, that's correct. Do you want to create a PR to update it?

Sorry for the slow response; I'm just back from vacation. My take is that this is not a common enough requirement for Ramda. You might want to check whether [ramda-adjunct][ra]...

So is this something we can just fix by updating the README? Or is there more that we have to do?

I make no guarantees that it would be approved, but I would be happy to see a PR for this.

> I think the signature would have to be `Set a -> Set a -> Boolean`; Are you suggesting the native `Set` type or simply lists that are assumed to...

Of course not everything we might want to test for uniqueness/subset is necessarily ordered. I don't think an actual implementation could use any kind of `sort`.

...or conceivably to support something like https://github.com/sanctuary-js/sanctuary-set/pull/1.

That's a huge piece of work. I was really just riffing on the suggestion from @buzzdecafe. Ramda generally does not supply types. But because of our insistence on value equality,...

@Ruben9922: Are you interested in submitting a PR for this?