Scott Sauyet

New commits: - Cleaned out the changed `modification` fields - Separated the footer just with white space, removed the color - Increased the font-size in the tab buttons - Removed...

@pmario: > I am OK with the existence of a "show footer" configuration, but I am not sure about it's skip-footer implementation. That's certain, if we're thinking about this as...

@yaisog: > I don't believe that this will ever become a core feature. I'm pretty sure I agree. @pmario surprised me with that, and I tried to adjust my thinking...

@Jermolene: > I would like to see something along these lines in the core. Can I suggest that we do a first pass in the docs wiki (where we don't...

Sorry, I've been heads-down on another project, and will remain so until we manage to run our political event on April 27. But I will get back to this afterward....

This scares the heck out of me. I certainly understand the desire, and agree. But I'm scared of unmaintainable code. I'm scared of losing the simplicity of our API. I'm...

Seeing the initial implementation, I'm much less concerned. This is clearly reasonable. If we get to the point where we have to check equality of keys, we might need a...

@ krainboltgreene: I'd suggest trying to resurrect #1056, which had a reasonable start at an implementation. I do believe something useful could be built on this.

@Deviad: It's not the syntax of `switch` I was objecting to, but the basic idea of code switching on types. We've added a fair bit of that in the time...

@knpwrs: That looks very nice. I'm figuring somehow or another Ramda post 1.0 will have to support Maps and Sets, although because of immutability it would have to be in...