Scott Sauyet

@adrian-gierakowski: Are you still interested in creating a PR?

Great! Feel free to post a PR with it. We're trying to clean up all sorts of old issues on the way to getting v1.0 out the door.

We're trying... finally!

I'd have to think carefully about what it means to support transducing on objects. I think about `take(2)` for instance, We think in Ramda as `{a: 1, b: 2, c:...

Sorry, hadn't seen the PR when I responded. I'll check there.

It shouldn't be surprising to see Ramda behave differently from lodash. They have different philosophies and different priorities. However, Ramda already dispatches on `all`, and `Object` is a straightforward expansion....

@dmitriz: >> I think Foldable is all you need, however you will probably get some pushback because it's already been decided that Object doesn't implement Foldable. It has been discussed...

Yes, although that would change the current short-circuiting behavior.

@dmitriz: I see two problems with using `Set`s for any of our work. First, Ramda has been trying to maintain compatibility with older versions of the language, something I want...

@ivenmarquardt: Objects are also used as Dictionaries, keyed collections of values of the same type. It's a fundamental tension in JS, powerful at times, frustrating at others. Unless we try...