Larry Garfield
Larry Garfield
Here's what I've got for the Ontology so far. Note that the docs seem a bit inconsistent about whether it's preferred to make a class or just define arrays, so...
Enabling types => include does allow the process to finish and run to completion, and appears to work(!). I'd still rather have a properly defined ontology, though, so I know...
Any further thoughts here?
And of course the whole thing needs gobs of tests.
Type maps aren't necessary on enums. As long as you're using their backing value in the serialized data, they should "just work."
Hm. Can you turn that into a failing test PR, so I can have a look when I next have time?
Currently this is explicitly not supported. I never did figure out a way to describe deep arrays that include objects, and IMO that's a sign that your data model is...
I'm still not following... An array shape attribute would be more akin to what PHPStan does with shapes in docblocks. You would never write your own, except maybe as a...
Oh my... A couple of thoughts: * I'd rather not merge anything until a final complete version is ready. That way we don't leave early designs lying about in the...