cdp-frontend icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
cdp-frontend copied to clipboard

Homepage Landing Container Design

Open hawkticehurst opened this issue 4 years ago • 9 comments

Note: Please Read The Entire Conversation Of This Issue Our thoughts have changed from the original content of this issue and are continuing to evolve on this topic.

Original Issue Per the UX Research recommendations having some form of friendly illustrations that can make the homepage more approachable and potentially add some personality would be great.

Whether this is creating illustrations or sourcing high-quality illustrations with permissive licensing we are open to help in this department.

@JacksonMaxfield @tohuynh Additional thoughts and feelings?

hawkticehurst avatar Mar 11 '21 06:03 hawkticehurst

Yea I think both the UX teams illustrations and the illustration currently up on councildataproject.github.io are from undraw

That said. I am not entirely convinced on illustrations on the landing page. I agree that we should make it more approachable but I think I need to see some landing page experiments first.

evamaxfield avatar Mar 11 '21 06:03 evamaxfield

Also inserting my opinion I'm going to say if we could avoid using https://www.humaaans.com/ that would be nice. While I absolutely adore that website, I think these illustrations are overused at this point and would detract from a sense of unique personality for CDP.

With that said, this isn't a super strong opinion so others are more than welcome to disagree if there's an illustration that feels particularly fitting for CDP.

hawkticehurst avatar Mar 11 '21 06:03 hawkticehurst

Hah. Yea. I think we have similar ideas.

CDP should largely be devoid of illustrations imo. I think we can be more approachable though accent colors and iconography and such or maybe an illustration once but that's about it. I remember when the feedback came back from the UX interviews, a couple of people said they appreciated that because the design of the current site was so minimal they trusted it more.

I think that is what we should strive for. Minimal to the point of "just the facts" / "pure utility" with accents here and there to make it more approachable and unique in our own style.

But that is also just classic modern tech stuff so maybe I have just gone off the deep end.

evamaxfield avatar Mar 11 '21 06:03 evamaxfield

I think we do indeed have similar ideas.

Now that you mention it, illustrations in my mind might actually be more akin to subtle accent colors and iconography that generally raise the baseline aesthetic or polish of the website versus an overly dramatic hero illustration.

I think the goal should be to convey a sense of credibility and polish without getting in the way of the user.

So with that thinking should I potentially relabel this issue @JacksonMaxfield?

hawkticehurst avatar Mar 11 '21 06:03 hawkticehurst

Yeah I think can just be relabeled to probably landing page container? The search + filters stuff I mentioned in the other issue?

evamaxfield avatar Mar 11 '21 06:03 evamaxfield

Errr I guess Search container / Hero component are probably different? Idk how to think about that

evamaxfield avatar Mar 11 '21 06:03 evamaxfield

In which case, this depends on #37

evamaxfield avatar Mar 11 '21 06:03 evamaxfield

I'm OK with illustrations if they convey information that's not already on the page. For example, I don't think the search illustration adds much since there's already a looking-glass search icon button and the word 'Search' throughout the landing page.

tohuynh avatar Mar 12 '21 04:03 tohuynh

Friendly illustrations can serve more than just an aesthetic purpose. The "purely functional" look can lead to an intimidating "Wall of Text" that really detracts from usability (and certainly may scare away people who are not being task-directed in a usability study!). Some things really are easier shown than read.

BrianL3 avatar May 07 '21 18:05 BrianL3