Costor

Hi, this seems to have stalled. If we need a second version of the release note that is explanatory with examples etc. I need advise on how and where to...

Hi, I have added a moderate level of expansion to qapply. This gives expanded and simplified results identical to the previous qapply in almost all cases but no longer expands...

I'm also about adjusting the release notes accordingly. Since function arguments are no longer expanded, it is still breaking, however the effects will be much, much minor.

> > 1. Users could do .expand() instead. > > If we already have expand then I don't see the need to add a deep option. Same goes for the...

> > 2. Did I get you right: you advocate for less default expansion? > > In general I would prefer it if functions in SymPy had distinct uses and...

Sorry, I hadn't see all the review comments that came in yesterday before entering the refinement of today. So I haven't integrated the review comments yet, but will work on...

I believe I can implement most if not all of your review comments. It is also obvious to me that there are design features in SymPy that I didn't knew...

(failed tests due to a general problem: Network problem Connection failed [IP: 20.106.104.242 80], i.e. some outage on Azure network or ubuntu package store.)

Please continue the review. Would be great if the new qapply made it into 1.12.

Re: "the code is significantly more complicated and I'm not convinced that it needs to be" I believe there are two layers here I need to clarify, and to lessen...