Pedro Torres

Results 39 comments of Pedro Torres

@alex88 @Antake2333 do you have a full code working example? I'm running into the same issues as described above. Basically I have the ABI and want to decode the transaction...

@Antake2333 is there's a working example to decode function parameters given that you have 1) smart contract address, 2) smart contract ABI I'm referring to the following [example taken from...

Found a workaround, but limited. Basically I know the`tx_data` so I don't have to call to get the `Transaction` ```rust // Need to take out the "Ox" prefix let tx_data...

Found the solution ```rust // Need to take out the "Ox" prefix let tx_data = "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"; ``` ```rust let mut byte_array = [0u8; 260]; hex::decode_to_slice(tx_data, &mut byte_array).unwrap(); ``` ```rust let...

I have exactly the same bug ![image](https://github.com/commitizen-tools/commitizen/assets/53630064/b4fb0035-4136-4df4-9561-0b7121cb33f7)

Any quick solution to this bug? (that is not `--no-verify`)

It would be amazing to have support for 3.10 and 3.11

Thanks @xmatthias for the reply and clarification

Good question, I coded this using old documentation from Bitfinex (they have replaced it) two years ago. There's the possibility that I got it wrong or that they have updated...

Hey @asehmi that would be fantastic, I will gladly accept the PR. I've wanted to extend some of the functionalities, but unfortunately, I do not have the time on my...