Corentin Barreau

@ato first and foremost thanks for the thoughtful explanation and for emphasizing transparency. I really appreciate you taking the time to discuss this, I really do! --- > My goal...

@wumpus sorry I am confused, what do you mean? I do not see any point of view shared here. Only 2 messages as followed: > Appreciate your politeness. > I...

> Now that you've convinced me I'm a recalcitrant rapscallion who doesn't truly love the spec, how do you think it should be updated to support HTTP/2? :-) Haha! I'm...

> To emphasize it again: it's only about the form not the semantics. Otherwise a reprint of a book would be already called a "falsification". @sebastian-nagel thanks for your answer....

> although Corentin would presumably call that 'falsified'. Ok just to be clear once and for all, because I can see my use of the word touched some nerves, which...

> And that's how it's done: The `WARC-Protocol` field holds the HTTP version. The original headers (`Content-Length`, `Content-Encoding` and `Transfer-Encoding`) are preserved and prefixed by `X-Crawler-`. If the payload length...

@copilot it wasn't asked to do a warcprox-compliant endpoint. Add stuff like component_queues informations in the Prometheus endpoint instead.