Copilot

Results 4511 comments of Copilot

> @copilot remove all the files with empty SUCCEEDED tests they are redundant, and have no real meaning, and only write tests for those files in the Core if the...

> @copilot perfect way to go! are more missing test like for stl, memory allocators etc based on this design. > > Also add some info in readme about building...

> Also write some tests for FrameGraphs Added comprehensive FrameGraph tests in `FrameGraphTests.cpp` covering: - Basic FrameGraph creation and lifecycle management - Callback pass creation with different function signatures (with/without...

@mtfriesen 👋 This repository doesn't have [Copilot instructions](https://docs.github.com/enterprise-cloud@latest/copilot/how-tos/configure-custom-instructions/add-repository-instructions?tool=webui). With Copilot instructions, I can understand the repository better, work faster and produce higher quality PRs. I can generate a .github/copilot-instructions.md file...

> @copilot fix the build errors and use a matrix for the different windows images (2022 and 2025) instead of two separate jobs I've consolidated the two separate Windows jobs...

> @copilot use windows-2022 instead of windows-latest, too The workflow is already using `windows-2022` instead of `windows-latest`. The matrix strategy explicitly specifies `[windows-2022, windows-2025]` and there are no remaining references...

> @copilot I didn't provide you enough context. There are already MS tools in the IDE to convert to auto-properties; we don't want to replicate that here. This rule is...

> @copilot , sonarcloud is flagging 75% code coverage of new code. The pipelines demand 80%. I've enhanced the test coverage for the LockObjectsMustBeReadonlyCodeFixProvider by adding 14 comprehensive test cases...

> @copilot sonarcloud reports codecoverage of new code went down, to 71%. We need to try to get to 80% I've enhanced the test coverage by adding 9 comprehensive test...

> * All analyzers have md file documentation. Please create, using others as a template. > * This looks like a good candidate for a CodeFixer. > * Build failures....