Copilot

Results 4898 comments of Copilot

@yebai 👋 This repository doesn't have [Copilot instructions](https://docs.github.com/enterprise-cloud@latest/copilot/how-tos/configure-custom-instructions/add-repository-instructions?tool=webui). With Copilot instructions, I can understand the repository better, work faster and produce higher quality PRs. I can generate a .github/copilot-instructions.md file...

Just as a heads up, I was blocked by some firewall rules while working on your feedback. Expand below for details. > [!WARNING] > > > Firewall rules blocked me...

Just as a heads up, I was blocked by some firewall rules while working on your feedback. Expand below for details. > [!WARNING] > > > Firewall rules blocked me...

> @copilot, you might need to use [DI.value_and_jacobian](https://juliadiff.org/DifferentiationInterface.jl/DifferentiationInterface/stable/api/#DifferentiationInterface.value_and_jacobian) to fix error... Fixed the test failures by updating the `adjoint_test` function to use `DI.value_and_jacobian` for vector-valued functions. The issue was that...

> @copilot This should use another finder struct and not the attention finder. It should run after running `find_attention`, it should look for the `group[tag=attention]` operator(not a flash decoding o......

> @copilot Please fix the CI failures. Fixed the CI failures. The issues were: 1. Incorrect namespace structure causing scoping problems 2. Wrong matcher usage - should use `match::has_op_value("tag", "attention")`...

> @copilot Please fix the CI failures. Fixed additional CI issues. The main problems were: 1. **Integer Underflow**: Fixed expressions like `ndim() - 3` that could cause underflow when ndim...

> @copilot Try agai please I've implemented the basic decorator transformer infrastructure but discovered the core issue: my decorators aren't being transformed because they're not properly integrated into the transformer...

@SimonCropp I've opened a new pull request, #1651, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.

@SimonCropp I've opened a new pull request, #1652, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.